Few direct comparisons can be made between US President George W. Bush's inaugural speech Thursday and his first in 2001, but there is one overwhelming similarity: They both reflected their times, very different times.
The president's speech four years ago touched on a variety of issues: education, equal rights, social security and defense. There were no surprises and no overwhelming theme, which was in line with the general tone in America as Bush first took office.
In Bush's second inaugural speech, he referred to the times between the fall of communism and the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the US as "years of relative quiet, years of repose, years of sabbatical."
"And then there came a day of fire," he said.
Since the first inaugural speech, the US has experienced the worst attack on its soil in history, economic recession and a costly and controversial war in Iraq.
These historic and devastating events during Bush's first term culminated in what became the overarching call in his second inaugural speech -- the need for everyone in the world to be free.
"The survival of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty in other lands," he said Thursday. "The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of freedom in all the world."
"There is only one force of history that can break the reign of hatred and resentment ... and reward the hopes of the decent and tolerant, and that is the force of human freedom," he added.
Despite the very different tone in the US since January 2001, direct parallels can be made between the two inaugural speeches.
During Bush's first inaugural address, he also referred a number of times to the important cause of freedom.
"If our country does not lead the cause of freedom, it will not be led," he said in 2001. "... We will meet aggression and bad faith with resolve and strength. And to all nations, we will speak for the values that gave our nation birth."
He also spoke of the danger of weapons of mass destruction and building the US military, "lest weakness invite challenge."
The danger of weapons of mass destruction and the importance of US defense took on new meaning after Sept. 11, 2001.
Like he did four years ago, Bush also touched Thursday on the familiar domestic issues of education, equal rights and the need to reform the Social Security retirement program.
"To give every American a stake in the promise and future of our country, we will bring the highest standards to our schools and build an ownership society," he said. "We will widen the ownership of homes and businesses, retirement savings and health insurance, preparing our people for the challenges of life in a free society."
However, Bush continually returned Thursday to his focus on the spread of freedom.
"By our efforts, we have lit a fire as well, a fire in the minds of men," he said. "And one day, this untamed fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world."
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS