The offer of debt relief by rich industrialized nations to tsunami-hit Asian countries provides a ray of hope to other poor debt-laden nations, mainly in Africa, which for years have cried out for similar help.
Analysts said the concerted move by the creditor nations to help the devastated economies in south Asia could put debt relief or write-offs for these struggling nations center-stage on rich nations' agendas.
"There is an effort being made to move the debt relief agenda forward. The tsunami itself is providing a context within which the debt relief agenda can sustain the move forward," said Edward Clay, senior research associate at Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
Japan is the latest country to join the growing list of nations, including Britain, the US, Germany and France, calling for a freeze on debt repayments by tsunami-hit Asian nations.
But some analysts said while the move to offer debt relief is a magnanimous gesture on part of rich nations, countries like India, Thailand or Indonesia are fiscally sound enough to pay off their foreign borrowings. The disaster is unlikely to make any significant dent in their economic growth projections.
Sri Lanka and Maldives, heavily reliant on tourism and clothing exports, need more help than others as the damage suffered relative to the size of their respective economies has been substantial.
"Indonesia needs assistance in kind like shipment of food, coordination rather than debt relief because the fiscal situation doesn't really warrant it," said Richard Segal, an analyst at emerging debt specialist Exotix.
Resource-rich Indonesia's budget deficit is just 1.4 percent of its GDP, while India expects to hold its deficit at about 4.4 percent for the year to end-March.
There are other mitigating factors. Asian economies are sitting on a pool of US$2.3 trillion of foreign currency reserves.
India's foreign exchange reserves are estimated at US$131.02 billion, Thailand's at US$49.1 billion and Indonesia's at US$36.32.
Rating agency Standard & Poor's said Indonesia had the resources to service its foreign borrowings.
"At this stage, Indonesia has the capability to service its domestic and foreign debt. The devastation of outlying provinces by the Indian Ocean tsunami did little to detract its debt-servicing ability," S&P said.
Australian Prime Minister John Howard said he was concerned that any move to forgive or freeze debt repayments would not help those most in need.
The ODI's Clay said history showed most disaster hit countries used more of their own resources than foreign money to rebuild economies.
"When you do look at disasters over a more extended period, typically the countries themselves pick up most of the costs," he said.
But Clay did note that debt relief could help nations save money for necessary relief and reconstruction activities.
Analysts said the proposed tsunami-related debt moratorium and the recent move by the Paris Club of sovereign creditors to cancel 80 percent of the debt Iraq owed to its members would spur demands for similar offers for other poor, indebted nations.
"What about all the African countries which are far more deserving than say Iraq and Indonesia," Segal said.
Oxfam said generous debt relief for the tsunami-hit countries should not come at the expense of the poorest countries that are expected to receive 100 percent debt relief later this year, nor should it be included as aid money.
"The sums that rich countries invest in global poverty reduction are shamefully small. At an average of US$80 per person per year in rich countries, the sum is equivalent to the price of a weekly cup of coffee," Oxfam said in a recent report.
The Sub-Saharan African nations, among the world's poorest, had a total external debt of about US$191.3 billion at the end of 2002, according to data from the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Britain, which assumed the presidency of the Group of Eight rich nations (G8), has said it is eager to tackle Africa's economic woes and wants its allies within the G8 to agree to multilateral debt relief, set a timetable for raising development aid to 0.7 percent of national income and sign up to a scheme to double Third World aid.
Barbara Stocking, director of Oxfam, said the crisis reinforces the need for the world to double aid spending, cut the debt of poorest nations and help them break out of poverty.
"This meeting is an opportunity for the G8 countries to show they have the ambition and drive to make this happen," she said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS