The offer of debt relief by rich industrialized nations to tsunami-hit Asian countries provides a ray of hope to other poor debt-laden nations, mainly in Africa, which for years have cried out for similar help.
Analysts said the concerted move by the creditor nations to help the devastated economies in south Asia could put debt relief or write-offs for these struggling nations center-stage on rich nations' agendas.
"There is an effort being made to move the debt relief agenda forward. The tsunami itself is providing a context within which the debt relief agenda can sustain the move forward," said Edward Clay, senior research associate at Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
Japan is the latest country to join the growing list of nations, including Britain, the US, Germany and France, calling for a freeze on debt repayments by tsunami-hit Asian nations.
But some analysts said while the move to offer debt relief is a magnanimous gesture on part of rich nations, countries like India, Thailand or Indonesia are fiscally sound enough to pay off their foreign borrowings. The disaster is unlikely to make any significant dent in their economic growth projections.
Sri Lanka and Maldives, heavily reliant on tourism and clothing exports, need more help than others as the damage suffered relative to the size of their respective economies has been substantial.
"Indonesia needs assistance in kind like shipment of food, coordination rather than debt relief because the fiscal situation doesn't really warrant it," said Richard Segal, an analyst at emerging debt specialist Exotix.
Resource-rich Indonesia's budget deficit is just 1.4 percent of its GDP, while India expects to hold its deficit at about 4.4 percent for the year to end-March.
There are other mitigating factors. Asian economies are sitting on a pool of US$2.3 trillion of foreign currency reserves.
India's foreign exchange reserves are estimated at US$131.02 billion, Thailand's at US$49.1 billion and Indonesia's at US$36.32.
Rating agency Standard & Poor's said Indonesia had the resources to service its foreign borrowings.
"At this stage, Indonesia has the capability to service its domestic and foreign debt. The devastation of outlying provinces by the Indian Ocean tsunami did little to detract its debt-servicing ability," S&P said.
Australian Prime Minister John Howard said he was concerned that any move to forgive or freeze debt repayments would not help those most in need.
The ODI's Clay said history showed most disaster hit countries used more of their own resources than foreign money to rebuild economies.
"When you do look at disasters over a more extended period, typically the countries themselves pick up most of the costs," he said.
But Clay did note that debt relief could help nations save money for necessary relief and reconstruction activities.
Analysts said the proposed tsunami-related debt moratorium and the recent move by the Paris Club of sovereign creditors to cancel 80 percent of the debt Iraq owed to its members would spur demands for similar offers for other poor, indebted nations.
"What about all the African countries which are far more deserving than say Iraq and Indonesia," Segal said.
Oxfam said generous debt relief for the tsunami-hit countries should not come at the expense of the poorest countries that are expected to receive 100 percent debt relief later this year, nor should it be included as aid money.
"The sums that rich countries invest in global poverty reduction are shamefully small. At an average of US$80 per person per year in rich countries, the sum is equivalent to the price of a weekly cup of coffee," Oxfam said in a recent report.
The Sub-Saharan African nations, among the world's poorest, had a total external debt of about US$191.3 billion at the end of 2002, according to data from the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Britain, which assumed the presidency of the Group of Eight rich nations (G8), has said it is eager to tackle Africa's economic woes and wants its allies within the G8 to agree to multilateral debt relief, set a timetable for raising development aid to 0.7 percent of national income and sign up to a scheme to double Third World aid.
Barbara Stocking, director of Oxfam, said the crisis reinforces the need for the world to double aid spending, cut the debt of poorest nations and help them break out of poverty.
"This meeting is an opportunity for the G8 countries to show they have the ambition and drive to make this happen," she said.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS