Reduce greenhouse gases
Carbon dioxide is considered the major gas that causes the greenhouse effect, or global warming. The combustion of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) provides energy but emits exhaust containing nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide (CO2), water vapor, sulfur dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen oxides (NOx). CO2 is generated in massive amounts, typically at 2-3 times the amount of coal burned. In terms of CO2, SO2 and NOx emissions, natural gas is the cleanest fuel, followed by oil and coal.
SO2 and NOx are acid rain precursors but their emissions are far less than CO2 emissions and can be reduced by more than 90 percent with currently applied exhaust cleanup technologies. For example, SO2 can be reacted with a lime solution to form gypsum as a byproduct; and NOx can be catalytically reduced with ammonia to form harmless nitrogen and water, with oxygen as a by-product.
In contrast, it is difficult, if not impossible, to reduce CO2 emissions by more than 90 percent unless the fossil fuel consumption can also be slashed by more than 90 percent through a combination of energy conservation, efficiency improvements and lifestyle changes. For example, energy savings can be achieved to a certain extent by preheating combustion air with flue gas waste heat, using oxygen (at an extra cost) or oxygen-enriched air instead of air for combustion, installing fuel cells for electricity generation, etc.
Alternatively, CO2 can be recovered from exhaust, compressed and injected underground or undersea. However, the environmental impacts of CO2 injection have to be assessed carefully since, in essence, CO2 is moved from air to land or water.
There has been an idea to dispose CO2 by catalytically reacting it with hydrogen to produce methane, which is the major component of natural gas. This idea sounds good but has a fallacy: the generation of hydrogen from fossil fuels also involves CO2 emissions. The so-called hydrogen economy has the same fallacy. Even if hydrogen is generated by the electrolysis of water, the generation of electricity from fossil fuels involves CO2 emissions as well. Incidentally, methane in air is another greenhouse gas more potent than CO2 per molecule.
Eventually, when fossil fuels are used up, people will have to use solar energy (including biomass and other regenerable energy) and nuclear energy. The CO2 emission problem might vanish. However, will a "global cooling" or other problems occur instead?
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Democratize China
One only has to look at the one party government of the People's Republic of China (PRC), including its legislative body, to see how absurd this "anti-secession" is ("Anti-secession bill makes no sense," Dec. 28, 2004, page 8).
Hong Kong's legislative body, however miserable it is, at least has 49 percent of its representatives directly elected by the population. While the "people's" Congress in Beijing, consists exclusively of communists, whose members number around 30 million. In other words, the 1.3 billion Chinese people have no representation -- only the obligation to pay taxes and to die in wars waged by the communists.
As an American, this "taxation without representation," looks to me like a good reason for revolution, be it against colonialists or anything else.
Communist China, from its "Constitution" on, has the same farcical authoritarian laws as previous imperial regimes. They do not recognize the concept of rule of law, or any legal standards outside of China, be it international law or UN declarations. The laws they do have are arbitrarily enforced by layers of bureaucracy, which, in practice, twists these laws to the breaking point.
The greatest thing Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) could do, would be to democratize China, return the power to the people and let the people make their own laws and decisions. China should also be governed by the consent of the people as in any other modern country. Hu's name would surely be remembered for centuries to come.
The PRC must first get to know the rules and principles of law before they enact this absurd "anti-secession" law.
Ming-Chung Chen
Chicago
Taiwan's Chinese is modern
Taiwan is indeed a better place than China to study Mandarin because it is safer and has a better educational infrastructure ("Taiwan ideal place to learn Chinese," Dec. 27, 2004, p.2).
But the most important reason is that Taiwan has preserved the essence of Chinese culture better than the communists in Beijing. Taiwan maintains the traditional (complex) system of writing characters, which is a vital link to centuries of Chinese texts and is aesthetically more beautiful than the simplified system, which the PRC promoted to indoctrinate the populace and to destroy traditional culture.
Taiwan, a society of immigrants standing at the crossroads of international commerce, has welcomed diasporas from all provinces of China and overseas (along with their cuisines and work ethics) and infused this eclectic Chinese culture with the best of the West, including democracy and capitalism. In contrast, China is ruled by a communist regime founded on Marxism and Leninism, ideas which have nothing to do with traditional Chinese culture.
Rather than discarding its roots (as some independence hardliners advocate), Taiwan should better market its comparative advantage as a Chinese yet modern nation. Foreigners studying in Taiwan can sometimes more clearly see the nation's future prospects.
Vincent Wei-cheng Wang
Richmond, Virginia
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS