Unsurprisingly, the High Court yesterday rejected the second lawsuit filed by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
The ruling on Lien and Soong's first lawsuit, in which the two sought to annul the presidential election itself, also rejected their claims. As Lien and Soong had immediately appealed against that ruling, it is expected that they will also lodge an appeal against the latest ruling.
The question that Lien and Soong must ask themselves is this: What is the purpose of clinging to their grudges and hatred left over from the presidential election by going through the motions of filing these appeals when they know perfectly well that they have no chance of winning? Is it to save face or give Lien a reason to hang on as KMT chairman?
The fact that the pan-blue camp barely managed to hold on to a legislative majority in the Dec. 11 elections has somewhat saved the pair from further disgrace -- although they had the pan-greens' obsession with vote-allocation to thank for that. Moreover, people had pretty much accepted the fact that Lien will exit and bow out only when and if he feels like it -- which may be never.
Now that the legislative elections are over, there is no need to worry about potential negative impact on voter support. What could be a better time to let the curtain fall on the soap opera surrounding the presidential election?
Except for a small number of conservative and radical pan-blue supporters, people have gotten so bored with these lawsuits, it would be extremely inhumane to force them to serve as spectators any longer. After more than seven months of litigation, with the KMT and the PFP unable to present a shred of credible evidence to prove any illegalities in the presidential election, and after a complete recount of all the ballots failed to reveal a significant discrepancy in the number of votes garnered by each side, it is time to end the farce.
Conceding defeat shouldn't be such a difficult thing. Just learn from Chen: After leading his party through a series of election wins since 2000, the failure of the pan-greens to garner a legislative majority must have been difficult to accept. Some people came to Chen's defense, arguing that the DPP did not really suffer a defeat, since it still holds more legislative seats than any other party and in fact garnered two additional seats. However, Chen has nevertheless candidly conceded defeat by taking responsibility for the pan-greens' failure to achieve a legislative majority. To demonstrate that he is not just engaging in empty rhetoric, Chen has resigned as Democratic Progressive Party chairman.
It is most unfortunate for Ukraine that, after the revote in the second round of its presidential election, the third round of voting this year, the defeated Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych is still unwilling to concede defeat and that the controversies will continue to unsettle the country and challenge its political democracy. Hopefully the fate of Taiwan will be different -- if Lien and Soong can finally accept their defeat and move on.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS