The nations of Southeast Asia have signed a range of agreements with China which will culminate with the possible creation of a ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (FTA) in 2010, giving China access to the 1.8 billion-person ASEAN market. Southeast Asia has come to resemble China's back yard as a result of Beijing's efforts to create harmony with its neighbors.
Some analysts see China's recent Southeast Asian policies as a kind of Monroe Doctrine with Chinese characteristics. The characteristics of this policy are the generous "offerings" made to Southeast Asia in exchange for long-term benefits, the creation of an image that it is a friendly and peaceful hegemony, and constantly reiterating the "one China" policy.
We should be concerned over the potential economic and commercial impact this arrangement has on Taiwan. Given that Taiwan is a member of the WTO, such impact may be reduced by means of the development of a multilateral trade system. But the diplomatic and psychological impact of China's "Monroe Doctrine" may be more direct and severe -- which, of course, is China's intent.
China has already been successful in marginalizing Taiwan diplomatically. The consequences of China's ties with Southeast Asia may be the result of a vicious cycle from which Taiwan will find it difficult to escape.
Looking at Taiwan's "go south" policy, we can see that too much emphasis was put on economic and commercial benefits, with no real policy to dissuade people from investing in China. The policy failed to build connections with Southeast Asian countries, and has made no progress toward signing free trade agreements with them.
In addition to China's obstructionism, the reason why relations between Taiwan and Southeast Asia have been stagnant is Taiwan's insufficient effort to engage those countries, and even a tendency to withdraw from engagement. This is a result of limited diplomatic personnel and resources, a lack of long-term interpersonal networks and unfamiliarity with Southeast Asian languages and culture.
There is little reason for this situation. Moreover, I believe Taiwan has at least three advantages in establishing relations with Southeast Asian nations.
First, China's diplomatic offensive in Southeast Asia can be countered by Taiwan's comparative advantage in commerce. Moreover, Taiwan can engage in trade-based diplomacy with Asian nations by offering them a generalized system of preferences to promote relations.
Second, geopolitically speaking, Taiwan should reinforce its claims to the South China Sea. By making forceful claims to sovereignty in this region, Taiwan will force Southeast Asia to take note of Taiwan and respect its geopolitical links to the region. This will increase engagement and also enhance our bargaining leverage in negotiations.
As a result, Southeast Asian nations may be willing to sign treaties of cooperation with Taiwan or make agreements regarding standards of conduct in the South China Sea.
Third, while the number of foreign spouses (mainly wives) from Southeast Asia has increased, the policies aimed at them are mostly related to issues of family, education, society and culture. From a long-term perspective, these spouses and their children are an asset to Taiwan, because they can promote better understanding and improved relations with Southeast Asia. After all, intercultural marriages are the most profound form of cultural integration. The children of such marriages will play a crucial role in advancing relations between Taiwan and Southeast Asia.
Johnny Chiang is an assistant professor in the department of political science at Soochow University.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS