We are delighted to hear that Japan has announced that it will give former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) a visa for his visit to Japan on Dec. 27. We applaud Japan's humanitarian considerations in putting aside objections from China to deal with a personal visit in a normal way.
Since the end of World War II, Japan has had its self assurance compromised, and because of this has not been a normal country. In that time it has given China huge amounts of economic aid. But China continues to use the crimes committed by the Japanese in the 1930s and 1940s to hijack Japan's compassion during crucial moments as a means of obtaining political advantage.
We sympathize with the hardships suffered by the Chinese people before and during World War II. And we have also taken note of Japan's introspection about its militaristic ideology over the last half century and the effort it has put into smoothing over the historical differences that it has with its Asian neighbors. But why has Taiwan been the only country omitted from these efforts?
In 1895, the Qing Dynasty ceded Taiwan to Japan under the Treaty of Shimonoseki (
We are not trying to claim any historic debt from Japan. We simply want Japan to take seriously the existence of Taiwan.
We are delighted to see that Japan is becoming a normal country and that it is moving toward establishing a normal relationship with Taiwan, rather than simply giving in to all of China's demands. As China is becoming a stronger military power and is beginning to threaten the balance of power in Asia, we call on Japan to assume the responsibility of a major regional power and help maintain security.
Since Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi took office, his actions have shown the world Japan's efforts to free itself from China's manipulation. This includes Japan's unprecedented support for Taiwan's membership in the World Health Organization and its willingness to grant a visa to Lee.
Taiwan has long been a major source of tourists to Japan and most Taiwanese have travelled there. When hundreds of thousands of Taiwanese visit Japan every year, why should Lee be prevented from doing so? To deny him entry would clearly be a case of discrimination and a violation of human rights. Lee's visit makes one think back to the visit by Tokyo Governor Shintaro Ishihara in October to help promote tourism to Taiwan.
There have been suggestions that Japan will give Taiwanese citizens visa-free entry during the half-year period of the Expo 2005 in Aichi. A visit by the highly charismatic Lee at this juncture is likely to have the same kind of positive effect for Japan's tourism as Ishihara's visit had for Taiwan's.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its