The onslaught of the winter Typhoon Nanmadol made everyone forget the intense legislative election campaign, as early warning and disaster prevention mechanisms were initiated in the hope of minimizing damage.
Although everyone agrees that "an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure," an oft forgotten principle is that making preparations even before the threat of a disaster has appeared is more important than strengthening preparations when a disaster is already approaching.
Winter typhoons are extremely rare. Are they the result of climate changes, or are they natural disturbances in weather patterns? The scientific community is still unable to determine this. If recent phenomena are a part of these changes, we may be too late if we wait for scientists to propose a concrete solution before we act.
The Kyoto Protocol, aimed at restricting industrialized nations' greenhouse gas emissions, will take effect on Feb. 16 -- 90 days after the UN received Russian President Vladimir Putin's signature on the agreement. The convention on climate change affects societies, environments, economies and even national defense and diplomatic relations. Despite the effects this important convention will have on Taiwan's future development, the government has treated it as a low priority.
After the Kyoto Protocol takes effect, international reductions and measures will be implemented. As Taiwan faces this "storm," the government should not simply choose to let things take their natural course.
Although scientists are still unable to clearly forecast the temporal and geographic extent of climate change, a majority agrees that if greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase, the climate will change, and it may become completely different from the current climate. Because we have no way of predicting the future, conservative hopes must not deviate too far from the current situation.
Scientists estimate that global greenhouse gas emissions should be reduced by 60 percent or more to keep concentration levels below 25 percent. The current stage of the Kyoto Protocol only requires an average reduction of 5.2 percent by 2010.
The main argument of those opposing immediate reductions is a lack of scientific evidence. But what they are really worried about is the costs of such reductions. If we consider the situation using a time-frame of 100 years, however, the benefits to future generations, ecology and socio-economic activities in reducing or eliminating greenhouse gas emissions are certain to outweigh the costs, and that is why such reductions should, and must, be carried out.
Doing this at an early stage will reduce the burden on future generations to carry out reductions, and that is why environmental activists unanimously demand immediate action.
Some members of government and industrial leaders, however, have differing opinions when it comes to the questions of how much, when and how reductions should be implemented, as well as how long it will be before costs are returned, and whether implementation of reductions will affect competitiveness, thus handing advantages to adversaries.
As a result of worries over future uncertainties and the possibility that the advantages of reductions will not appear immediately, little has actually been done.
Although there still is no conclusive scientific evidence that climate change will initiate an increase in adverse weather, 30 years of international insurance industry data show that losses caused by natural disasters have increased by between five and 10 times over the past 12 years. Even if we ignore the greenhouse effect, the government should be strict in its implementation of measures to minimize losses from natural disasters, just as it takes preventative action when a typhoon is nearing.
Some examples of this would be to prohibit development and cultivation in disaster-prone areas, encourage indigenous peoples to move to safe areas, strengthen education in disaster prevention and how to avoid exposing oneself to danger, carrying out an overall review of existing land programs, and to use legal and policy incentives to encourage the public to participate in soil, water and resource conservation measures.
The soon-to-take-effect Kyoto Protocol makes a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions even more unavoidable. Although Taiwan is not a signatory of the protocol, it cannot remain aloof. Nor can it rely on taking advantage of the actions of other countries.
The countries and industries of Europe and North America have on many occasions used international environmental treaties to set up trade barriers or prohibit environmentally unsafe products. These types of measures could seriously hurt an export-oriented economies like Taiwan.
Furthermore, when the Kyoto Protocol was written, most people were aware that reduction targets fell well short of what scientists were suggesting.
The hope, however, was that lower targets would attract the participation of more countries. The hope was also to use official measures to reduce questions regarding execution. In future, reduction targets will be expanded and the number of participating countries will increase. When most countries participate in reductions, the drawbacks for individual countries will decrease, and there will be even fewer opportunities for a free lunch.
Ninety-seven percent of Taiwan's energy is imported. Energy savings measures would not only decrease the use of foreign currency and a reliance on energy imports, it would also relieve the impact of fluctuations in international energy prices.
If many public institutions were to make small adjustments to their operations, many obvious results would follow, such as creating unambiguous and easily understood energy labels to allow consumers a choice, improving mass transportation and reducing energy needs and prioritizing the purchase of energy-saving products to point the way for manufacturing industries.
In addition, reusable energies such as wind power, solar power and landfill gas could create a more diverse energy system, offer more room for individual choice, and strengthen overall security of the energy system. Benefits would of course not be limited to the commercial sector.
Crisis can be an opportunity. International environmental agreements are becoming increasingly strict, and the need for fossil fuels is growing rapidly. This has already forced global energy prices to increase and made energy-saving methods and new energies more competitive.
The government should not only find ways of reducing losses from natural disasters, it should also promote energy-saving measures and develop reusable energy. It should also provide ample information to make the public understand the problems attached to a continued use of fossil fuels and allow industry enough time to prepare or even set up new industries.
Only by properly preparing itself can Taiwan be confident in handling the ever-changing international situation. The relationship between environmental protection and economic development has changed from one of opposition to one of mutual influence and growth. This understanding is a crucial link as Taiwan develops into an advanced country.
Gloria Hsu is a professor of atmospheric sciences at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS