One obvious conclusion can be drawn from the distribution of votes between the different parties in the legislative elections: there is basically no difference from the results of the elections three years ago.
Whether we look at the number of votes won by the different parties, their proportions of the total vote or the number of seats won by the blue and green camps, the situation remains almost static.
Keeping in mind the upsetting presidential election and the political situation and social unrest that followed, how could this be?
The people most disappointed by the outcome of the the elections are probably two presidents.
Despite former president Lee Teng-hui's (
The trend was more or less the same in every city and county, nor were there any obvious differences between the north and south.
The blow to President Chen Shui-bian (
Unexpectedly, the strategy failed completely, and the number of votes won was the same as three years ago. Because voter turn-out was low, the final proportion of votes won was 37.5 percent, a small increase of only two percentage points.
Deducting the TSU's 800,000 votes, the total number of votes won by the DPP in the legislative elections was approximately 2.2 million lower than the number of votes won by Chen in the presidential election nine months ago. So what are voters thinking?
Looking at the number and proportion of votes won by each party in different areas, the DPP did not win a majority in any city or county except for Ilan County. In Taiwan south of the Chuoshui River, they saw an increase in Chiayi County, but in other cities and counties, results were about the same as in 2001. Looking at actual votes won, the changes were even smaller.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) won 240,000 votes more than in 2001, or about four percentage points, and increased its number of legislative seats by eight. The main differences occurred in Taipei County and City because of a more cautious approach in the nomination process -- to avoid repeating past mistakes -- finally brought results.
The People First Party's (PFP) losses "complemented" the KMT's gains. The party lost 560,000 votes, or almost 5 percentage points, and eight seats. As a result, the blue camp maintained the same number of seats, making the whole election exercise look like a storm in a teacup.
But why didn't the large number of opinion polls published prior to the elections detect this phenomenon?
At least half of the answer to that question is to be found among respondents that could not be included in the telephone queries or that did not respond to the polls.
Although Taiwan is inundated by opinion polls, very few pollsters are willing to spend time on these two categories of respondents, which means that there is still much to learn. Do voters want to slow things down, or do they want to turn the political clock back?
Hung Yung-tai is a professor in the department of political science at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS