After the 2000 presidential election, former president Lee Teng-hui (
After the KMT and PFP became allies, for both this year's presidential election and the upcoming legislative elections, the pan-blue camp has attempted to focus on issues related to the public's livelihood or the government's achievements while campaigning. However, the direction of Taiwan's political situation mostly focuses on our national status. The issues of whether to amend the Constitution or create a new one, the question of the national emblem and title, and criticism of the KMT's outdated party-state ideology have dominated the campaign. This has gradually become the public consensus.
The pan-blue camp proposes maintaining the status quo, saying that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent sovereign state, so it is unnecessary to rectify the nation's name. This will both maintain the government's legitimacy and avoid irritating China or triggering a war in the Taiwan Strait.
These statements are not groundless. They are based on realistic considerations and profound historical and cultural motivations. The problem is this: Ever since the early 1990s, a pattern has emerged in the development of Taiwan's rule of law. Taiwan has repeatedly proven through upholding the processes of Western democracy that the nation is indeed an independent sovereign state. Through successive democratic elections, Lee and Chen's administrations have firmly demonstrated our existence.
In my opinion, the mainstream opinion in Taiwan is neither to maintain the status quo nor boost the economy, as the pan-blue camp claims. It is impossible for Taiwan to accept the status quo of not being recognized as a nation. In particular, whether you like them or not, and whether you agree or not, Taiwan's constitutional reforms, especially those in the 1990s, were accomplished through democratic procedures.
Of course, this does not mean that the pan-green camp's accusation that the pan-blue camp is using China's military threat as a campaign trick to scare the Taiwanese people is true. The myth of Chinese nationalism has not yet been broken, and it serves as an emotional basis for a unification by force. This can't be resolved simply by telling the public not to be afraid. Those in power, if they are responsible enough, should be extremely cautious about any possible tragedy caused by irrational factors.
As voters, the only value that we must safeguard is respect for decisions made through democratic procedures. After Taiwan's democratization process over the past half a century, we should certainly clear away accumulated anti-democratic sediment so as to improve the quality of democracy.
We are now in the last phase of our transformation. No matter how the pan-blue and pan-green camps attack each other, both sides believe in democracy and Taiwan's status as an independent sovereign state. Obviously, our problem is external recognition, not internal awareness. How to avoid internal confrontation is the biggest challenge to our democracy at present. Since politicians are so unreliable, we can only hope that voters will act in a mature fashion.
Sun Ta-chuan is the director of the Graduate Institute of Ethnic Development at Donghua University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS