The recent debate over a proposed ten percent reduction of classical Chinese material in senior high school is actually a very good thing. It creates an opportunity to discuss a key issue: should a curriculum focus more on serving a pragmatic purpose, such as shaping students' ability to write and express their views in a coherent, easy-to-understand, logical manner? Or should a curriculum be designed to spark students' interest in classical literature? The answer is the former, so under the circumstances the proposed curriculum change is a step in the right direction.
The value of any language study is first and foremost in helping people communicate and get their point across. It is only after people have a good command of the basics that they can do so in an elegant and artistic manner. A widespread problem today is the lack of basic language and writing skills to accomplish even the most elementary objectives. Those who teach in senior high schools and at universities recognize this as a serious problem.
One reason for the deficiency has been the way Chinese literature is taught in schools. Students memorize by rote ancient poems and essays written in classical literary Chinese, and then have to write compositions imitating an ancient literary style. As a result, few students in Taiwan can write a well-structured essay, with a consistent central idea running through it, with supporting facts and arguments and a conclusion. No amount of flowery phrases cited from ancient classical essays can help cover up these fundamental flaws in composition.
This would be unthinkable in Western countries. In the US, although reading Chaucer's Canterbury Tales is part of the high school English curriculum, students aren't required to memorize particular paragraphs, let alone imitate ancient language used in their own writing. There are good reasons for this. In real life, no one in their right mind writes like that anymore; doing so would simply kill interest and appreciation for the masterpiece.
Granted, mastering traditional Chinese writing is a very good thing. For those with a keen appreciation there is always the option of specializing in Chinese literature at university. But high school level training should be communication-oriented. In most professions, writing serves the practical purpose of conveying ideas and thoughts -- something more efficiently done by using modern-day language. For example, the legal profession in the US was once notorious for using language filled with complex legal jargon -- "legalese." After decades of reform, lawyers are now trained to write in plain English.
Unfortunately, almost nothing can escape politics in Taiwan, and the proposed change to high school curriculum is no exception. Opponents call it an attempt by education minister Tu Cheng-sheng (
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS