The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is pathetic. Before the presidential elections, it planned to sell its China Television Company, but was stopped by the Government Information Office.
Next, the pan-green camp launched a high-profile investigation into KMT assets, the Executive Yuan accused the Broadcasting Corporation of China of plundering public assets, and Premier Yu Shyi-kun was quoted as saying that getting back the stolen assets pillaged by the KMT would provide money for elementary and junior high school students to have free textbooks. Recently, the headquarters of China Television Company was impounded due to the Procomp Informatics Co financial scandal.
With access to funds blocked, the KMT said it had problems with capital turnover, was unable to pay salaries and was short of money to fund its election campaign. The leader of the KMT has not only been beaten from pillar to post by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), but even the proposed "nuptials" with the People First Party now seem anything but certain.Without its once-abundant funds, how is the KMT going to fight the upcoming legislative elections?
Presidential Office Secretary-General Su Tseng-chang (
For example, President Chen Shui-bian's (
The pan-blues, on the contrary, have nothing to keep them busy. As a result, they can only reminisce about their glorious past and wallow in despair. This is actually not a false accusation brought against the leaders of the pan-blues. For the past few months, apart from questioning the honesty of Chen, the pan-blues have not come up with any constructive ideas in cross-strait policies, or on domestic, diplomatic or national defense issues. Their cross-strait policy is simply a restatement of "one China," and "maintaining the status quo." In domestic affairs, the KMT is merely bidding against the DPP on the national pension issue, and it opposes the DPP's educational reform without putting forward any ideas of its own. The KMT has shown itself unable to take a lead in the growing anti-arms procurement movement. If the pan-blues ruled Taiwan they would not shorten the list for arms procurement, but they currently accuse the DPP of using arms procurement as preparation for independence.
The reason why legislative elections are devoid of excitement is because it is usually up to the opposition -- in this case the blue camp -- to challenge the government and get the debate going. Over the past four years, the KMT has often accused the DPP of not having learned how to govern. Looking at the current situation, we see that the DPP is increasingly capable of ruling but that the blue camp is still the same as it was before March 2000.
Why is this so? Because the blue camp was convinced it would win this year's presidential elections and return to power, so its four years in opposition were spent in the same frame of mind as Chiang Kai-shek's (
First, for the past four years, it still has not changed its administrative framework and continues to pay high salaries to political officials to do desultory research studies in the hope of using their expertise to rule Taiwan in four years time.
Second, the size of the KMT's headquarters has not changed greatly, for they hoped to use this election machine to regain power.
Third, there was no pressure to sort out the party assets issue in a timely fashion, because if the KMT had won the presidential elections, no one would dare pursue the matter.
After four years, the KMT has been unable to regain power. Its bureaucrats, for lack of a political stage, are becoming obsolete and the party machine is too rusty to operate properly. Only now is the KMT starting to face facts. It is withdrawing privileges from high-ranking officials who no longer hold office, cutting down on staff, selling its assets, and coming up with some creative ideas.
All of this may be too late. The increasingly competent DPP will not give the KMT any more opportunities to manage their unsold assets, and the KMT is becoming ever more burdened by all its expropriated possessions.
It is not hard to understand why KMT leaders such as Lien have such strong feelings about the March 19 shooting incident. If Lien had been elected, everything would be different; he would not be busy trying to make ends meet and accosted over the party assets issue.
Four years ago, Lien was lucky his political fortunes did not sink completely. So like a gambler he put all his hope in this year's March election. Now it's too late: even if the KMT makes an effort now, history may not wait for them.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS