Having just gotten back to Taiwan after two years overseas it's nice to see that not much has really changed.
An earthquake and typhoon in my first week back, legislators on the news behaving like children while throwing things at each other, and Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-Jeou's (
However one thing that really should have changed during these last two years has somehow managed to remain the same.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Lien Chan (
Does this man have no shame? You would have thought that two election defeats would be enough to convince even the most arrogant person that they just haven't got what it takes to win.
As if coming a disappointing third place four years ago wasn't enough, a second attempt, running in tandem with the ever-popular People First Party Chairman James Soong (
It's about time he realized that all the political science degrees and English skills in the world won't help you win an election if you lack charisma -- and sadly, this is Lien's downfall.
He may be rich and a powerful figure within the KMT, but he is about as exciting as a wet weekend in Keelung.
Simply put, he has no voter appeal. Instead of blaming himself, he attributed his defeats to former president Lee Teng-hui (
Look at the US and this week's presidential poll for an example of how this quality can work. US President George W. Bush has been a disaster for the US and the rest of the world.
He also lacks many personal qualities, but even he has charisma and he uses this to appeal directly to his supporters.
Lien should also look at the US and take a leaf out of Senator John Kerry's book.
Instead of starting conspiracy theories and encouraging civil disorder in a bid to cover up his election shortcomings, he should concede defeat gracefully and be content with a back seat role within the KMT.
Only then will he be behaving like the statesman he so desperately wants to be.
And maybe then he might finally earn the respect and popularity he desires from the electorate.
Richard Hazeldine
Sindian
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS