Recently, the Government Information Office (GIO) called China Television Company (CTV) to issue "administrative guidance," expressing concern over what it called excessively acrid remarks on Sisy's News -- a famous talk show hosted by independent Legislator Sisy Chen (陳文茜).
Such remarks could be seen as either significant or not. In particular, the uproar over the renewal of CTV's license just ended, and the December legislative elections are approaching. Things are especially sensitive at the moment, and media watchdogs ought to be careful.
Strictly speaking, government institutions' interference with what happens in TV programs is really not a democratic norm. Despite the fact that there is nothing irregular with the action the GIO has taken, this could lead to some loose talk.
It must be particularly cautious since the show is considered "anti-green." Concern without consideration will cause trouble. In fact, the GIO has been tarred with the brush of being concerned about programs critical of the greens.
Self-restraint, external control and the law can all be used to regulate media topics, but the law should be seen as the last resort. It is also not advisable to expect the media to understand the meaning of self restraint. In the end, one has to rely on TV viewers.
My advice to the GIO would be to exercise caution when dealing with such political opinion programs. First, it is best to avoid sending out direct administrative guidance like this. If this is truly necessary, the GIO can provide evidence of complaints received from the public -- such as the time the phone calls were made, the nature of their reaction and contact numbers -- and collect this information together to send to CTV.
It can also make a record of public reactions, and keep them as references for CTV's license renewal next time. Alternatively, if the public is somewhat reluctant to divulge personal details, the GIO could always inform them of CTV's toll-free service number, and get them to contact the station directly.
My advice to the public would be to make it a habit to express their opinions to the media directly. Do not forget, TV viewing is also a consumer behavior, and every member of the TV audience is a consumer. If this is true for fee-paying cable TV viewers, it is also true for those watching the terrestrial stations, whose channels belong to the entire public.
Those who are unhappy with what they are seeing on the box have both the right and responsibility to pick up the phone and tell the TV station which program they have a problem with. This is every viewer's right, and there is no need to go through the GIO at all.
So next time when you see an inappropriate TV show, I suggest you get on the phone. The viewer, after all, is the most effective TV watchdog. For me, the ideal situation would be one in which, in the near future, the TV audience takes a few tips from US viewers -- who made half a million complaints over the phone when Janet Jackson's breast got more TV exposure than was warranted. I, however, am not that greedy. I would be happy if only 10,000 Taiwanese viewers made that call to complain about something they disagreed with one day.
If the media are to improve, we should not rely on government control, and should look instead to the direct supervision of viewers. Remember to call the media when necessary. The TV schedules in all newspapers have the phone numbers of the various stations' customer service lines.
Chen Ping-hung is an associate professor in the Graduate Institute of Mass Communication at National Taiwan Normal University.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Deterrence is fading; war is looming on the Taiwan Strait and for other targets of the China-enabled dictatorship alliance, and after three years the cure is just dawning on the Biden Administration. Now mind you, for a May 28, 2024 interview with Time magazine, President Joe Biden made his 5th public commitment that the United States would defend Taiwan. Less than three weeks later the United States Navy, along with ships from navies of Japan, Canada, the Netherlands, and France, were conducting the Valiant Shield joint force exercise in the Philippine Sea south of Taiwan and in the South China Sea to
The official media of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) reacted to the May 20 inauguration speech of President William Lai (賴清德) by asserting: “Lai’s words reveal his true intention of sacrificing peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait for his own desire for power.” This baseless accusation by Beijing that Lai is manipulating Taiwanese to resist unification with China for his personal gain, is part of a broader CCP information warfare campaign that has intensified since Lai’s election. This campaign, orchestrated by the United Front Work Department, the CCP’s agency for coordinating influence operations and propaganda, aims to demoralize Taiwanese,
A facile way to frame the future of US foreign policy is to set up two scenarios as a binary choice. If former US president Donald Trump returns to the White House, the US becomes isolationist. If US President Joe Biden wins re-election, the US remains broadly internationalist. That framing neglects a change that might be less obvious but more consequential for other countries, a shift that would keep playing out no matter who wins in November: For the first time in its two-and-a-half centuries, the US would stop looking at the world through the lens of its own exceptionalism, and
Minister of Health and Welfare Chiu Tai-yuan (邱泰源) on Friday said the ministry supports keeping priority seats on public transportation, but is considering expanding the eligibility criteria and renaming the seats. Chiu’s remarks came after local news media over the past few weeks reported incidents involving priority seats, once again sparking heated discussion about whether the seats should be abolished or regulations regarding them should be revised. On June 11, an older woman asked a young woman on a Taipei MRT train to yield her priority seat. The young woman refused, saying that she needed the seat after working a 12-hour shift.