Despite high praise for President Chen Shui-bian's (
Intentionally overlooking Chen's suggestion to initiate confidence building measures to minimize cross-strait tensions -- including establishing an arms control mechanism and a "code of conduct across the Taiwan Strait" to reduce miscalculations -- China distracted public attention away from such pragmatic and strategic thinking about the sovereignty issue as a way to invalidate Chen's proposals.
Instead, the spokesman of China's Taiwan Affairs Office Zhang Mingqing (
Regretfully, this is not the first time that Beijing has sabotaged Chen's conciliatory gestures. Starting with his first inaugural address in 2000, Chen has consistently offered olive branches to his counterparts across the Strait. Not only has Chen agreed to discuss the question of a "future China" with Beijing, he has also proposed a model for "political integration" with China. On several occasions, he invited Chinese leaders to sit down -- in any place and at any time -- to straighten out mutual disputes.
China's downplaying of Chen's moderate gesture entails both domestic and external concerns. After successfully transferring power from the old generation to the so-called "fourth generation" of leaders, it is imperative for Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) to consolidate his power base by appealing to nationalism. By characterizing Chen and his government as hardcore separatists and independence advocates, Hu can strengthen his leadership and quiet Taiwan's unilateral pursuit of independent sovereignty.
Externally, Beijing has never given up its strategy of trying to take advantage of Taiwan's post-election political "turmoil" as a grounds for Beijing to "step in" and interfere with Taiwan's domestic affairs. Unless the pan-green camp can secure a majority after the December legislative elections, the chances for both sides of the Taiwan Strait to re-engage in mutual dialogue remain slim.
The question is, can Beijing maintain its policy of no contact with the Chen administration for the next four years? More importantly, can China put all its money on a resurgence of the pan-blues, without recognizing the "Taiwan consciousness?" Is time really on China's side?
The best scenario for restarting cross-strait contacts, under the current circumstances, is for the pan-green camp to win over half the seats in the legislature. With renewed public endorsement, the Chen administration will have more leeway to initiate cross-strait normalization. However, it takes two to tango. Were the pan-greens to succeed during the upcoming legislative elections, Beijing should relinquish its outdated strategy of trying to separate the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government from the Taiwanese public.
Moreover, international forces, led by the US, should accelerate their role in facilitating cross-strait talks. More should be done to educate the Chinese leadership to respect the decisions made by the Taiwanese people through democratic mechanisms and accept the offer that was presented by the DPP government to establish a peaceful and stable cross-strait relationship.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS