At their meeting in Luxemburg on Oct. 11-12, the EU foreign ministers decided to maintain -- for the time being -- the EU arms embargo against China. According to press reports, the EU will review its policy on the basis of three criteria: China's human rights record, tension with Taiwan and the as yet incomplete EU code of conduct on arms exports.
The Beijing authorities have argued that the arms ban is outdated and "a product of the Cold War."
French President Jacques Chirac has echoed this, and has become the EU's strongest advocate for lifting the embargo, no doubt driven by the prospects of lucrative orders for France's military industry. Reportedly, France's enthusiasm is also prompted by the desire to get China's support to have the the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor built at Cadarache, near Tarragone in the south of France.
The fact is, however, that the embargo had nothing to do with the Cold War, but was imposed after China's military crackdown in 1989 on peaceful demonstrators at Tiananmen Square. Since then, China's human rights abuses have continued unabated, and human rights organizations such as Amnesty International have documented that China's human rights record has in effect deteriorated over the past 15 years.
Lifting the embargo under these circumstances would send a distinctly wrong signal to China. The EU should let China know that improvement of human rights is a condition sine qua non for enhancing relations with Europe.
Just as important is stability in the Taiwan Strait: lifting the ban will have far-reaching implications for peace and security in Southeast Asia. It will upset the balance of power in the Taiwan Strait and cause instability in the region.
China itself is the major source of that instability in the Strait. Until now, the EU has hardly given any attention or thought to resolving the issue. Time has come for the EU to join forces with the US in convincing China that Beijing's policies toward Taiwan are an outdated remnant of the Chinese Civil War.
In his Oct. 10 National Day Speech, President Chen Shui-bian (
The EU thus needs to help convince Beijing that Taiwan is not the "arch-enemy" from the days of Chiang Kai-shek's (蔣介石) Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), but that -- after 38 years of martial law -- the Taiwanese people have made an impressive transition to democracy, and strive to live in peace with all their neighbors, including China.
Instead of considering the sale of arms to China, the EU should end its policy of isolating a democratic Taiwan, and work toward normalizing relations with Taipei. Such a policy is based on the basic principles of democracy and the right to self-determination as laid down in the UN Charter. Europe prides itself on its long history of democracy, from the British Magna Charta to the French Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite.
Selling arms to a repressive, communist China so it can threaten a newly free and democratic Taiwan would be a violation of the basic principles we Europeans hold dear. The EU should not let Taiwan remain an orphan, but help make it a full and equal member of the international community.
Gerrit van der Wees is editor of Taiwan Communique, a publication based in Washington.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS