Today's political leaders in the US, Taiwan and China are repeating old arguments and old ideas. Everyone talks either of "peace" or the dangers of "war." In Taiwan there is the opportunistic desire to curry favor with China by predicting defeat and disaster. There is also the blustering argument that China will have to pay a huge price if it attacks Taiwan.
Thankfully, there is another strategy. It is one based on the continuum of martial arts responses, a strategy to successfully defend the country and the individual that will last throughout the attack and create a secure future.
In addition to purchasing military equipment, President Chen Shui-bian (
Taiwan should be clear that Beijing is changing the status quo when and if it passes any law that prohibits the "independence" of Taiwan, or that declares an ultimatum or schedule for invading Taiwan.
Here are a few agenda items. First, in an imitation of the US' Homeland Security Notices, create a system of colored warnings that indicate the level of threat from China. Each warning level would have specific consequences.
Second, the first warning would deal with the 600 missiles along China's southeastern coast. The government should disallow any Taiwanese investment in areas close to these missiles. The rationale for this is that these sites would be military targets in case of hostilities. If Taiwanese people or Taiwanese property are endangered by the outbreak of war, then they could be held as hostages by China. In addition, the effort to compensate for their loss of property and loss of life would severely affect Taiwan's economy and sense of responsibility for the welfare of its people.
Third, a second-level warning should result in urging the US and other investors in China to limit their investments in provinces which have become a launching pad for intimidating or invading Taiwan. Once again, these territories are able to increase their military capacity because of foreign investment, which also promotes the development of transportation links, communication facilities and modern technologies.
Four, the third level of danger should increase Taiwan's attempt to seek military alliances and allies in East Asia. Support for Japan's bid to gain a seat in the UN Security Council should be followed with joint military exercises with South Korea and more strategic coordination with neighboring countries.
Fifth, the final level of danger should trigger a massive international political campaign -- namely the establishment of a geographical base for a government in exile, the open support for the independence of Hong Kong, Xinjiang and Tibet, and initial preparations for war crimes trials in other countries against China's leadership.
The government should prepare its citizens by establishing an intra-governmental committee to determine the costs of the current and future situation with a hostile China. It should also account for the amount of research necessary to study China's military and political leaders, the amount of resources used to protect, defend and monitor Taiwanese companies and individuals working in China, and the economic opportunities that would be lost by having Beijing embargo or restrict Taiwan's economic, political, cultural and social initiatives.
The government should include a public document that predicts Taiwan's economic loss if it joins with China. If we take Hong Kong and Tibet as examples, we will conclude that the economic effect on Taiwan will be to make it a neo-colony of China. Taiwan will have its industries hollowed out, its imports and exports dictated by Beijing's needs -- not by market forces, or by policies protective of Taiwan -- and will return to a repressive cultural system that will increase costs for a socially dysfunctional system.
The language will be forced to change, social customs will be harshly altered and newfound freedoms will be suppressed. The result will be a rise in deviant behavior, mental health breakdowns, decreased population growth and a rise in illegal organizations and activities.
After presenting the above analyses, it will become clear that the defense budget is a small price to pay to keep Taiwan from incurring the extra expenses of paying for a war strategy of defensive and countervailing stages.
Richard Kagan is a professor of history at Hamline University.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS