Comments by Richard Lawless, a deputy undersecretary at the US Department of Defense, regarding the controversial NT$610.8 billion (US$18 billion) budget for arms from the US, stirred up debate this week. Unfortunately, the reaction of most opposition politicians reflects the immaturity of this nation's democracy: National security continues to be subservient to the interests of political parties.
Lawless indicated that a failure to approve the budget would give China reason to believe that military intimidation is an effective means in bringing about unification, and would also turn Taiwan into a "liability rather than a partner" in the eyes of its friends. While some people feel that such talk is less than diplomatic, it is unfortunately an understatement of the cruel predicament this country faces.
Bluntly put, Taiwan should shoulder responsibility for its defense to the best of its ability. Otherwise, before long, no one will take its need for defense seriously.
The opposition camp's reaction to these comments was sadly predictable. The most vulgar example was People First Party (PFP) Legislator Sun Ta-chien (
For his part, PFP Chairman James Soong's (
Soong's remarks were, of course, at odds with the position held by the rest of the world -- that China is a threat not only to peace in the Taiwan Strait but to the entire region. He is daydreaming if he thinks that the removal of the DPP government would result in China withdrawing its hundreds of missiles aimed at this country.
He also said that the US' Taiwan Relations Act requires the US to "provide" rather than "sell" arms to Taiwan -- whatever that means. While the US government is no "mafia boss," it is certainly no charitable organization either.
The problem with the pan-blue camp is that it feels it has to oppose whatever the government proposes to make the government look bad in the minds of voters. In other words, it is completely incapable of transcending petty party rivalries in dealing with the issue of national security. To make matters worse, members of the opposition are incapable of separating their personal hatred of the DPP from debate on critical issues. These days, it's strictly personal.
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS