A well-known anecdote tells of a scientist who announces that he has invented a solvent capable of dissolving any existing material. A suspicious person then asks the scientist what he uses to store the substance.
In Taiwan, there is an institution that is just as mighty as that solvent. It can pass laws that would destroy the nation's legal foundations -- the Constitution, constitutional politics and human rights -- and there is no mechanism with which to restrict it. It is the legislature. In the past, on the instruction of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), this all-powerful institution froze the Constitution by passing the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion (動員戡亂時期臨時條款), which became the most potent instrument of Chiang's authoritarian rule.
Although Taiwan is now a democracy, the spirit of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) remains the same. The blue camp, holding a legislative majority, recently helped pass the March 19 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee Statute (三一九槍擊事件真相調查特別委員會條例) on the instruction of KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰). Transcending the Constitution and human rights, this statute undermines the principle separating the government into five branches as specified in the Constitution and also tramples on human rights. The law is not meant to pave the way for new authoritarian rule under the KMT, but rather to avenge Lien's defeat in the presidential election.
The statute stipulates that the funds required by the truth committee will come from the Cabinet's budget, and the Cabinet does not have the right to refuse. This is in clear violation of the powers bestowed on the Cabinet in the Budget Law (預算法), including budget allocation, review and execution rights.
The statute also stipulates that truth committee members will be appointed proportionally according to party representation in the legislature -- effectively usurping the authority of the Judicial Yuan. In addition, there are no laws restricting or regulating the committee, which is not required to produce subpoenas, search warrants or other documents required in any legitimate judicial procedure, and thus it all but overturns the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法).
Furthermore, according to this statute, investigations by the committee need not follow normal legal procedures, and individuals, organizations and even government bodies cannot refuse to be investigated, unless they are willing to face fines up to NT$1 million, possible prison sentences and denial of their right to leave the country. This is a gross violation of human rights, pure and simple.
Under the Constitution, the Control Yuan has the right to launch investigations and impeachment proceedings. In response to calls for an investigation into the March 19 shooting, President Chen Shui-bian (
On Tuesday, the blue camp proposed amendments to the statute. But as DPP spokesperson Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said, all the pan-blue camp is trying to do is reduce the extent to which the statute contravenes the Constitution from 85 percent to 75 percent.
There is no guessing how many more constitutional crises Taiwan will have to endure if Lien does not get his way and become president. The KMT's reactionary nature is unwavering. In the year-end legislative elections, the people must decide whether Lien's attack on constitutional government is worthy of their support.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS