The nation has always been independent from China. Not for a single day has it been ruled by China. Twenty-three million Taiwanese -- 7.7 times the number of Singaporeans -- have the absolute right to advocate continued independence from China.
The UN has the duty to protect the human rights of Taiwanese people, who outnumber the people of Singapore by 20 million. The nation's people have the right to pursue an internationally-recognized status as an independent and sovereign nation.
When Singapore's Foreign Minister George Yeo (
Yeo said that if there were any push toward independence, a war across the Taiwan Strait would be very difficult to avoid and that the stability of the Asia-Pacific region and even the world would be at stake.
Such statements only serve to further encourage aggressive powers to violate human rights with military force.
Many groups in the Canadian province of Quebec that have advocated and worked for independence did so without the Canadian government aiming 600 missiles at them.
Nor did the federal government fire test missiles over Quebec to intimidate the population, which is about the same as Singapore's. Just as the independence movement in Quebec has not sought to incite a war, the independence movement in Taiwan -- which has not for one single day been ruled by China -- has not created the current risk of war in the Taiwan Strait.
China's aggression is the primary reason a risk of war exists in the Taiwan Strait.
Not only did Yeo's speech at the UN General Assembly seriously violate the human rights of Taiwan's 23 million citizens, it also encouraged the violation of human rights by military powers.
The Taiwan Association of University Professors solemnly would like to tell our Singaporean friends that Yeo's speech -- in its tacit support for military power -- will sooner or later place them under the same tyrannical authority of those powers.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS