After 11 Academia Sinica members publicly criticized the proposed arms procurement plan, those who oppose the plan launched a large demonstration on Sept. 25. They stressed that although the budget of NT$610.8 billion (US$18 billion) will be spread over 15 years, the annual expenditure of NT$40.72 billion will crowd out other domestic expenditures, decreasing Taiwan's GNP by about 0.27 percent.
Strangely, they did not mention the nation's massive investment in China (about NT$408 billion per year), which is the equivalent of 4 percent of the nation's GDP. Not to mention that Taiwan's total investment in China over the past decade already exceeds NT$5.44 trillion.
The yearly investment of NT$408 billion in China is not a small amount, and it is 10 times Taiwan's proposed weapons purchase budget per year. By the opposition's calculations, such investment may decrease the country's GNP by about 2.7 percent. Therefore, if they really care about people's livelihood, and the sustainable development of Taiwan's economy, they should oppose the enormous capital outflow to China first, not the arms procurement plan.
People may argue that the national defense budget is considered a "non-productive expenditure," while investing in China is considered an economic activity. But if we calmly examine the situation, we will find that a large portion of the budget will circulate back to Taiwan and stimulate domestic demand and consumption. On the contrary, experience tells us that the capital of the Taiwanese businesspeople operating in China has never flowed back over the past 14 years. Such an investment pattern is not helpful to Taiwan's economy, and it only strengthens China's national power.
Moreover, those who advocate "marching west" (to China) often say that "Taiwan's trade surplus with China has exceeded US$200 billion in recent years, and the nation will suffer a trade deficit without its large exports to China." The fact is, Taiwan has given up its US, European and Southeastern Asian markets in an effort to march west.
In particular, the nation's market share in the US has already dropped from 5.8 percent in 1987 to 2.8 percent in 2002. The reduction of exports to these places is estimated at US$300 billion, which is much higher than Taiwan's trade surplus with China.
Recently, some also said that Taiwan can avoid the "hollowing out" of its industry only by using relatively cheap Chinese resources. Experiment is the best way to test a theory. The 14-year experiment has come up with an answer: Taiwan's investment of NT$5.44 trillion in China has failed to boost our competitiveness or economy, which is now inferior to that of South Korea.
The investment of South Korea in China is less than one-tenth of Taiwan's. However, since it does not solely rely on cheap Chinese resources, it has advanced its technologies, and is catching up with, or even surpassing Taiwan in terms of its average GNP. Have those who oppose the arms procurement plan noticed that?
If we really care about public welfare and the nation's economy, we should oppose "China fever." If we can reduce our excessive investment in China, we will be able to stimulate various domestic economic activities, increase tax revenues, resolve the current financial difficulties, lower the unemployment rate and raise national income. The annual weapons purchase budget of NT$40.72 billion will then no longer be a problem.
Taiwan's economic and fiscal problems lie in the outflow of money to China, not the arms procurement plan. The people who oppose the plan should have held a demonstration in Beijing, not Taipei.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS