Disregarding public protests that the March 19 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee Statute (
The committee is now ready to operate starting next Monday, raising fears that the nation may once again be torn by confrontation between the blue and green camps.
The statute absurdly specifies that the committee will have 17 members drawn from outside the legislature or other government agencies, based on the number of seats the political parties hold in the legislature. All members can instruct prosecutors to search and investigate whoever is suspected or accused of being involved in the shooting. Those who refuse to cooperate shall be given a fine of no less than NT$100,000, and can be fined repeatedly. If the court's final ruling is different from the committee's investigation results, the committee can request a retrial.
We all know that not even the minister of justice, the public prosecutor general, or even the president of the Judicial Yuan can tell prosecutors or judges how to carry out their investigations, prosecutions or trials. Yet this "special committee" not only enjoys the power to conduct judicial investigations, but also the investigatory powers that constitutionally belong to the government's administrative and monitoring agencies. The committee even has the power to interfere with judicial rulings.
Faced with this nonsensical law, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union are refusing to participate. As a result, all committee members belong to the pan-blue camp, such as Shih Chi-yang (
After the presidential election in March, the street demonstrations willfully and arbitrarily stirred up by the pan-blues caused public support to plummet for the pan-blue camp in general and the PFP in particular. Yet the pan-blue camp continues unperturbed, inciting demonstrations against the arms procurement budget with the excuse that they are looking after the public's hard-earned money. They say that the Truth Committee "is a reasonable mechanism that prevents the DPP from blocking the search for the truth." Do they really think that such far-fetched excuses will deceive the people?
According to reports, funds are already being raised to support prosecutors, other officials and members of the public who are unwilling to be co-opted into this "pan-blue investigation committee." The funds will be used to pay the fines for non-compliance to underline that this pan-blue organization is unconstitutional and absurd. That funds are already being raised for this purpose indicates broad dissatisfaction with the committee, and also highlights the necessity for confrontation between the green and the pan-blue camps.
The most bewildering aspect of the pan-blue camp's policies is that its opposition to the arms budget will weaken the nation's defensive capability, while its special commission threatens the judicial system and disrupts social order. China can only be delighted by these prospects, so the pan-blue camp seems to be less fighting for truth than seeking the nation's downfall.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS