Taiwan first lady Wu Shu-hen (
I believe the IPC's action is worthy of recognition from all who love Taiwan. The first lady and the entire Taiwan delegation are entitled to further support and encouragement from every Taiwanese.
Therefore, together with other progressive organizations, I have drafted an open letter to the IPC to commend it on its fair and just action, and to support the first lady -- who in spite of weak health continues to stand up for her people and country -- and all Taiwanese athletes.
This letter along with e-mail addresses are provided for public use, and I expect each Taiwanese send an e-mail to the IPC to support our delegation and speak out for the energetic Taiwan civil society. E-mails can be sent to the IPC at info@paralympic.org, or to the IPC's Executive Committee contact Leen Coudenys at leen.coudenys@paralympic.org.
Dear International Paralympic Committee President Craven,
I am writing this letter to commend the International Paralympic Committee for its courageous decision to respect first lady Wu as the head of the Taiwanese Delegation.
Both you and I have been expecting the positive inspiration that the Paralympic athletes' excellent performance will have on the global community of disabled people.
This will be demonstrated and appreciated through empowering outstanding disabled athletes to achieve sporting excellence in a fair and just competition.
The Paralympic spirit should above all be about fairness, which is often not given to people with disabilities. Today IPC's important decision to respect Taiwan's first lady as the head of the Taiwanese Delegation has demonstrated the true spirit of fairness and justice.
The vision of the IPC is "to enable Paralympic athletes to achieve sporting excellence, and inspire and excite the world."
The IPC creates the conditions for the empowerment of athletes with disabilities through self-determination. This vision is the reason why the IPC exists.
Today, your action demonstrates great moral strength and upholds this vision despite external intervention.
In this way you have helped protect the integrity and dignity of our athletes and their outstanding leader. For this, I highly commend you on your great moral courage and efforts.
I want to also express our appreciation and encouragement to the first lady and the entire Taiwanese team. Despite her weak health, first lady Wu has stood up for her people at a difficult time by committing herself to the enhancement of the human rights of the disabled, and the protection of national dignity.
I also appreciate our athletes' courage and confidence in supporting their leader and achieving sporting excellence in the coming games.
They have shown the best example possible for all disabled people around the world to stand up for a just cause and dignity.
Please convey my sincerest respect to the IPC, first lady Wu and the Taiwanese team.
Hsiu-min Wu
President of the Taiwan Northern Society, Taipei
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS