The Examination Yuan has come up with "four noes" as guidelines for the setting of national-level exams. About three of these noes, no political ideology in questions, no racial or sexual discrimination and no classical Chinese literature, we have no complaint. But given the importance of building a Taiwan-centered consciousness, not only among the public at large but in the bureaucracy -- which since 1945 has been a redoubt of an ethnic group with very mixed loyalties -- the fourth no can only be regarded as a huge mistake.
We refer, of course, to the decision that exams are not to be based on any "dialects that have not been accepted by the general public." This weasel phrase actually means languages spoken by the people of Taiwan, such as Hoklo, Hakka or Aboriginal tongues.
So what language is to be used for exams? Well, the very one which almost no native used in Taiwan until it was imposed upon Taiwanese by their foreign overlords in 1945 and ruthlessly promoted during the decades of colonial government that followed -- namely, Mandarin Chinese. So amid efforts to raise a national consciousness, exams for the civil service must be taken in the language of Taiwan's former oppressors and current enemies. It is hard to think of anything more crass.
The reason why Mandarin Chinese has been chosen as the only medium for national exams is that it is the one language that everybody who has been through the education system -- which presumably includes all those likely to sit for civil service exams -- can be guaranteed to speak, so well did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) do its work. So by adopting the Mandarin-only rule, examiners can ensure that no ethnic group is left out.
But Taiwan needs civil servants who identify with Taiwan, and it would seem reasonable to expect that someone born and educated here who identifies with the country might -- in fact should -- be expected to speak one of its languages. So some kind of local language component in the exams should be a priority and all exams should have a local-language component.
This could be a simply an extra paper testing candidates' ability in a local language. Or this paper could be dropped for those who choose take a paper in any other subject using a local language. The idea is a simple one. Have exams mainly in Mandarin if you wish, but make sure that all candidates are fluent in at least one of the island's languages as well. And, of course, it should be up to the candidates to choose which local language they wish to be tested in.
One problem about such a system is that it will make the Examination Yuan's task significantly harder; it will have to set and mark exams not only in Mandarin but also Hoklo, Hakka and any of the 12 recognized Aboriginal languages. Who in the Examination Yuan is capable of setting or marking an exam in the Tao language spoken on Orchid Island? On the other hand, this is a wonderful chance to bring one of the stuffiest of Taiwan's bureaucracies into contact with a wonderful range of linguistic and cultural diversity.
One group is sure to complain about such an arrangement, and that is the small number of Mainlander Mandarin monoglots who monopolized Taiwan's bureaucracy for half a century. They will protest about a "linguistic apartheid." Yet of course it is they who practiced linguistic apartheid, and the system we propose which could bring this to an end. Nothing prevents Mainlanders from learning a local language, as People First Party Chairman James Soong (
What Taiwan needs is an exam system in tune with both its cultural and ethnic diversity and responsive to the nation's needs. The Examination Yuan's new language rule is exactly the opposite.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS