Thanks to the Olympic gold medals won by Taiwanese athletes in Athens, the people of Taiwan can now believe that our nation is capable of winning internationally. The feeling of always ranking second is very frustrating.
After experiencing how sweet victory tastes after Taiwan's sports achievements, what will we do next? Minister of the National Council on Physical Fitness and Sports Chen Chuan-show (陳全壽) promised President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) in person that Taiwan's goal is to win seven gold medals at the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Based on our big population, stable economy, broad-based education and benign climate conditions, it is without doubt that Taiwan has the ability to win at least seven gold medals. Many small and medium-sized countries around the world perform better than we do. Taiwan had performed poorly in previous Olympic Games; if we want others to respect us, we must first possess the fundamental will to win.
Earning a gold medal in the Olympics is not easy for a country. There are three principle requirements: A large number of participants, a strategic cultivation program and sufficient funds. The making of a professional athlete doesn't simply come by diligent practicing and training, but also requires athletic talent; thus, the more people participate in sports, the more likely it is that quality sports potential can be singled out.
Furthermore, participating in sports activities needs opponents as well as applause to stimulate excitement and a sense of competition. Taiwan's former education system overemphasized intellectual development. This has caused Taiwan's young generation to be weak physically. On top of this, computer technology, wealth and insufficient sports facilities combine to reduce the number of people taking part in sports.
There are two approaches to winning prizes: One is choosing the right sports categories, and the other is strategically cultivating athletes. If our ultimate goal is to win gold medals, it would be wise to select sports categories that best suit the Taiwanese physique.
Nevertheless, regarding our national situation, we should challenge others by also going for sports categories that attract a wider audience and participants. A systematic cultivation of athletes requires a graded training and competition program, which will facilitate the process of chasing medals.
The auxiliary measures such as sports nutrition, coaches and training facilities all cost money; therefore, they should be integrated with sports funds to give athletes a friendly training environment. Nevertheless, it is not ideal to use money as an incentive for athletic excellence.
Though it may seem cost effective to give out rewards of only some NT$100 million to medal winners and have our national flag hoisted in the international sports arena, it in fact degrades the essence of sports by making it a marketable commodity rather than an activity for developing the body.
Today, Taiwan's situation in the international society is charged with danger. We cannot display our national flag and sing our national anthem. Therefore, apart from taekwondo, archery and baseball, we must find some other sports categories that can better summon group cooperation, give a boost to the morale, touch the public's hearts and stir up national dialogues. I think soccer would be a good choice since it is a sport that invigorates people's passion and strengthens national identity.
I dream of one day, maybe after 12 years, we will be able to enter the top 32 in international soccer. By that time, the international support we receive will definitely outweigh competition through military armaments.
Lin Wan-yi is a professor of the department of social work at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS