Bob Newhart did it. Fran Drescher did it. Tens of thousands of Web sites have done it. And now, in the pages of the New York Times, there it is -- a word modified with the ubiquitous izzle. Some clever Times copy editor created the headline, "Fo' Shizzle, That Big Bad Chrysler Really Does Sizzle."
The phrase made the headline because the person inquiring about the car was none other than the rapper Snoop Dogg, himself the creator of the izzle phenomenon and the man MTV calls the "slanguistic sensei" of the hip-hop generation.
Snoop Dogg, born Cordozar Broadus, isn't just a recording artist; he's a conglomeration. He has started a label; produced action figures, clothes and sports shoes; has appeared on television (Doggy Fizzle Televizzle); has starred in movies and commercials; has been the host of a radio show; and has introduced a language.
Slanguage is more like it, but it's based on his use of izzle as a suffix for existing words, sometimes substituting all but the first letter of a word -- calling himself, for example, D-O-Double Gizzle (Dogg) or saying to Jerry Stiller in a 2003 television commercial for AOL 9.0, "Now wait just one minizzle!" The most common variation is the one used in the headline, but no word is sacred when it comes to the izzle.
Affixes in music lyrics are nothing new. Prefixes, suffixes and infixes (added to the middle of a word) have been used in a variety of ways. Frankie Smith's 1981 Double Dutch Bus included a list of infixed names -- "Bilzarbra, Mitzery, Milzetty ... Titzommy, Kitzerrance, Kilzommy" -- at the end of the song. Grant Barrett, project editor for the Historical Dictionary of American Slang, traced the izz infix to a 1985 song titled Roxanne Roxanne by the Brooklyn rap group UTFO: "The izzi is the grizzeat Kizzangizzo."
A manufactured boy band, Another Bad Creation, hit platinum in 1991 with its album Coolin' at the Playground Ya' Know. In the one hit song on that album, Playground, the adolescent artists sang, "Into the Mizzark chillin in the pizzark ... mother said be home by dizzark."
Snoop Dogg wasn't far behind; his first recorded use of infixes came in his debut album in 1993. In the song Tha Shiznit, Snoop raps, "Is Dr. Drizzay, so lizzay and plizzay With D-O-double-Gizzay?"
The izzle, which is used as a suffix rather than an infix, doesn't show up in Snoop's lyrics until December 2000 in the song Snoop Dogg (What's my Name, Part 2), in which he raps over the intro with "Izzle kizzle, fo' shizzle" and other variants.
So where did it come from? Most people (other than hard-core fans) don't picture northern California as a hotbed of rap music, but it thrives in the Bay Area. Back in the mid-1990s, there were at least two rappers there using variants on the izzle suffix: E-40 and the group 3X Krazy.
E-40 claimed in an interview with viceland.com that he was "the first one who put `izzle' out there real tough in 1996 on my song Rappers Ball. We were saying fo'sheezy and fo'shizzle. ... That's a Bay Area word, man."
Rappers Ball does start off, "We off the heezy fo'sheezy," but izzle there isn't. On the same album, a song called Records Haters claims that "3X Krazy laced me, taught me how to say fo'sheezy."
Snoop himself said in an interview last year with the Portland Mercury that he brought the izzle into "the mainstream for sure -- but it's a way of speaking that's been around for years. It originated in Northern California."
There you have it. Variants of the izz affix have been threaded through rap music for decades, and the particular izzle comes from the earlier eezy, which originated in Northern California.
And now the izzle is everywhere, and not just in commentary about Snoop Dogg or incongruous sound bites used as comic relief in movies (like Newhart's deadpan fo' shizzle in Legally Blonde II) and commercials (like Drescher's nasally "my shizzle's gone fazizzle" in her role hawking everything Old Navy). It's actually been used seriously in the pages of Business Week and Fortune. Even Britain's High Court hasn't been immune, confronting what might as well have been a "foreign language," as one account put it, in a 2003 copyright case. The case, one justice told the BBC, "led to the faintly surreal experience of three gentlemen in horsehair wigs examining the meaning of such phrases as ... shizzle my nizzle." A truly remarkable bit of jurisprudence.
You can't go 15 minutes listening to the radio without hearing it in one form or another. Is it here to stay? Maybe in hip-hop, but nowhere else if Snoop has anything to do with it. Though you can still go to asksnoop.com and put any URL through the Shizzolator to have it instantly translated into the rizzle dizzle (real deal).
Snoop himself has had enough. He recently told MTV News: "The message is L.I.G.: let it go. O.K., America? Let it go. You can't say `izzle' no more. Tizzle, fizzle, dizzle -- none of that. It's over with ... Let's find something new. Maybe pig Latin, anything."
O.K., America? Etlay itay ogay!
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,