Hong Kong might not be as democratic as Taiwan, but its Legislative Council (LegCo) used to run cleaner election campaigns than Taiwan -- with better rule of law, and less gangster involvement or corruption. This, however, is no longer the case. Such a change has a lot to do with China's intervention. As the Sept. 12 LegCo election approaches, more problems are becoming apparent.
First, Beijing attempts to control Hong Kong-based media with the help of gangsters -- a prelude to its oppression of the pro-democracy activists. The gang-sters have blackmailed talk show panelists who embrace justice. Beijing, in return, has rewarded them for their patriotism with closer ties. Rewards such as political titles and easy access to the Chinese market have also been given to the owners of media organizations who have chosen to side with Beijing in this election. No wonder most media organizations in Hong Kong have unleashed attacks on the pro-democracy activists, striking a major blow.
Second, China is conducting a smear campaign against the pro-democracy activists. It used to criticize the smear campaigns in Taiwan, but now it is resorting to every conceivable means. For example, the security department in Dongguan, Guangdong Province, arrested Democratic Party candidate Ho Wai To (何偉途) under the charge of procuring the services of prostitutes. Without being tried in court he was sentenced by the department to six months education in custody. The department also made his detailed "confession" public.
Third, China's intelligence agencies have also taken the initiative. A few weeks ago, some pro-democracy sympathizers writing in newspaper columns revealed that Chinese agents had been sent to Hong Kong to collect information against the pro-democracy camp. Unfortunately, some members of the camp ignored the warnings. As a result, not only was Ho arrested, but James To (涂謹申) was also accused of using public funds to rent a property.
The so-called "brain" of the Democratic Party, Law Chi-kwang (
Fourth, Beijing is carrying out operations in a manner similar to tactics used during the Boxer Rebellion. The "Boxer" figures in Hong Kong, often referred to as the Victoria Park Old Men, are veterans of the 1967 left-wing riots. Dismissed by society for decades, they have now regained their force and passionately attack the pro-democracy camp. They routinely insult democracy leaders with vulgar and violent language in the City Forum they hold every Sunday in the park. The harshest criticism is directed at legislators like Emily Lau (
Fifth, thieves and the like are also taking part. The main force in the pro-democracy camp, the Democratic Party, has not been their only target. Frontier, a political organization, and Albert Cheng (
Frontier convener Emily Lau's residence was broken into on Aug. 29 after she had gone out. The break-in was so professionally done that Lau did not immediately notice that it had happened when she returned, nor did she find anything missing. Yet the documents at her home could have been photographed. The only noticeable difference was a pair of socks that had been moved from a storage room and placed on a table. Lau could not guess the meaning of this.
Lau and Cheng, however, did not back off. Chen has campaigned many times in a pro-China electorate and been cornered by dozens of the Victoria Park old men. He turned to the police for help in maintaining order and protecting his safety.
Amid these odd happenings, Philip Wong (黃宜弘) was elected in a functional constituency without campaigning for it. He certainly has powerful connections.
Lau Chin-shek (劉千石), a pro-democracy heavyweight who advocates reconciliation with China, suddenly needed to show his filial duty last month (although his father has been dead for more than two decades). For this reason he did not take part in any electoral debates. Maybe he will still be able to win with the votes James To lost in the scandal over his rental property.
These incidents put the pro-democracy camp at a great disadvantage in the election. The camp lacks the ability to handle crises and has experienced a decline in public support. It has tried to reverse the situation by organizing a campaign convention, but Beijing may still work to disclose more information against it. Therefore, the situation does not look good.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Jennie Shih
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and