What do former legislative speaker and People First Party (PFP) Legislator Liu Sung-fan (劉松藩), Yunlin County Commissioner Chang Jung-wei (張榮味), independent Legislator Yen Ching-piao (顏清標), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Ho Chih-hui (何智輝), former Tuntex Group chairman Chen Yu-hao (陳由豪), and former KMT-turned independent legislator Wu Tzer-yuan (伍澤元) have in common?
The first thing that comes to mind is that they are all members of the pan-blue camp.
The second thing is that they all worked very hard stumping for KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
The third thing is that they all have been under criminal investigation and that they all have been convicted of one form of corruption or another.
One is left wondering why so many pan-blue politicians and supporters have a criminal record.
Huge kickback
During his tenure as legislative speaker, Liu received a huge kickback for helping the Kuangsan Group obtain a loan from the Taichung Business Bank. He was sentenced to four years in prison for breach of trust and given a NT$30 million fine, a sentence that is final and cannot be appealed.
Yen was sentenced to eight years in prison in accordance with the Statute for Punishment of Corruption (
He was also sentenced to 13 years for corruption and attempted murder after having ordered subordinates to spray a car full of people with bullets.
Chang has an even longer record, including possession of arms and vote buying during his tenures as Yunlin County Council speaker and vice speaker. He is also suspected of being involved with the land purchase for the Linnei township incinerator.
Ho was involved in the Chiuchun construction loan scandal.
Chen is an economic fugitive, while Wu was involved in the Sipiantou scandal involving a project to build a water-pumping station in Taipei County.
The crimes of Liu, Chang, Yen, Ho, Chen and Wu comprise what is called "black gold" politics to a tee.
Corruption
This begs the question: Does the pan-blue camp attract corrupt people, or does it produce them?
In light of their role as an opposition alliance following the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections, it is surprising they have not been able to shed their connection to "black gold" politics.
The cases of Ho and Wu hardly need mentioning. Liu's resignation from his position as PFP legislator-at-large is evidence that he would rather flee abroad than go to jail.
After all, he can still find refuge in China, where Chen, Wu and Tseng Cheng-jen (曾正仁) are waiting to form a "club" where they can regain strength, and during the next presidential election, the blue camp can rely on the support of their gangsters and will not need the support of Taiwanese businesspeople in China.
Chang, Yen and Liu all claim they are the victims of "political persecution."
Given this fact, the blue camp could make this their central focus during the next presidential campaign in order show voters how authoritarian the Democratic Progressive Party is.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Perry Svensson
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS