Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
Public acknowledgement of China's "one China" -- and no Taiwan -- principle violates the basic human rights of the citizens of Taiwan.
Here's an example of how. My Taiwanese friend and her Greek boyfriend were going to get married. But when they went to the municipality where the Greek man resided, the city told them they couldn't get married. Why? Because there was a previous court case where a Taiwanese woman and a Greek man wanted to have a civil marriage, but his parents objected. The parents of the Greek man hired a lawyer to block the marriage. The lawyer used the argument that Taiwan is not a country, and therefore her identification was invalid. The Chinese embassy didn't help either, saying they had no records of Taiwanese citizens.
Ever since then, some cities in Greece just won't marry any Greeks with Taiwanese. All of these couples are educated women and men who met at universities in the UK.
Another example: In the Athens 2004 Olympic Games, the Taiwanese team was bound by the International Olympic Committee's unfair and outdated rules created especially for Taiwan, under pressure from China. Under these rules, although our athletes came from all over Taiwan and not just from Taipei, our team is not called "Taiwan," it is called "Chinese Taipei."
Would the US team like to be called "British Washington DC"? Would the Greek team like to be called "Ottoman Athens?" Taiwan's national pride and dignity was also hampered by the Chinese Taipei flag designed only for the purpose of the Olympic flag-raising. The flag carries the symbol of the party no longer in power in Taiwan, and the Olympic five rings. By the same analogy, would any Greeks like to have their national flag replaced by a flag especially designed for the Olympic Games with symbols of the Pasok party and the Olympic five rings? Any Taiwanese spectators showing their national flag, or carrying signs with "Taiwan" (instead of "Chinese Taipei") risked being thrown out of the games without refunds.
In the spring of last year, SARS, which originated in southern China, killed many in Taiwan. However, the WHO (World Health Organization) didn't send any delegates to help contain the epidemic until the situation was almost out of control. China claims that Taiwan is a province, and that Taiwan's healthcare system is well taken care of by them. Since Taiwan has never been under PRC administration, how can the health care system be taken care of by them?
Yet during their attempt to join the World Health Organization (WHO) -- a bid which was blocked by China -- the delegates from Taiwan were greeted by the Chinese Health Minister with remarks like "Who cares about you, Taiwan?" or "Who pays attention to you?" Taiwan sends many medical personnel to under-developed countries in Africa and Central and South America. But Taiwan's contribution to the world did not help them gain membership in the WHO. Taiwanese people have suffered greatly because of China's campaign to block them from participating in every international organization.
"The Strait that separate us can never cut off bonds of flesh and blood," Wen said. The US was founded by immigrants who left England. By the same analogy, should the US have remained under the control of the British crown because of bonds of flesh and blood?
Aside from the immigrants from China, Taiwan is more multicultural than Wen realizes. Taiwan has 12 Aboriginal tribes whose ancestry is from the Pacific Ocean side, not from China. More recently, there are immigrants from countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam.
Taiwan needs to have its existence recognized in a "normal" way so that the basic human rights of its citizens will not be sacrificed to international politics. In the meantime, Taiwanese hope their neighbor China will soon become a democratic country so that future generations can decide the course of the country. Any threats from China to take Taiwan into its territory by force will only push overseas Taiwanese extremists to become terrorists.
Alison Hsieh
Athens
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS