Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
Public acknowledgement of China's "one China" -- and no Taiwan -- principle violates the basic human rights of the citizens of Taiwan.
Here's an example of how. My Taiwanese friend and her Greek boyfriend were going to get married. But when they went to the municipality where the Greek man resided, the city told them they couldn't get married. Why? Because there was a previous court case where a Taiwanese woman and a Greek man wanted to have a civil marriage, but his parents objected. The parents of the Greek man hired a lawyer to block the marriage. The lawyer used the argument that Taiwan is not a country, and therefore her identification was invalid. The Chinese embassy didn't help either, saying they had no records of Taiwanese citizens.
Ever since then, some cities in Greece just won't marry any Greeks with Taiwanese. All of these couples are educated women and men who met at universities in the UK.
Another example: In the Athens 2004 Olympic Games, the Taiwanese team was bound by the International Olympic Committee's unfair and outdated rules created especially for Taiwan, under pressure from China. Under these rules, although our athletes came from all over Taiwan and not just from Taipei, our team is not called "Taiwan," it is called "Chinese Taipei."
Would the US team like to be called "British Washington DC"? Would the Greek team like to be called "Ottoman Athens?" Taiwan's national pride and dignity was also hampered by the Chinese Taipei flag designed only for the purpose of the Olympic flag-raising. The flag carries the symbol of the party no longer in power in Taiwan, and the Olympic five rings. By the same analogy, would any Greeks like to have their national flag replaced by a flag especially designed for the Olympic Games with symbols of the Pasok party and the Olympic five rings? Any Taiwanese spectators showing their national flag, or carrying signs with "Taiwan" (instead of "Chinese Taipei") risked being thrown out of the games without refunds.
In the spring of last year, SARS, which originated in southern China, killed many in Taiwan. However, the WHO (World Health Organization) didn't send any delegates to help contain the epidemic until the situation was almost out of control. China claims that Taiwan is a province, and that Taiwan's healthcare system is well taken care of by them. Since Taiwan has never been under PRC administration, how can the health care system be taken care of by them?
Yet during their attempt to join the World Health Organization (WHO) -- a bid which was blocked by China -- the delegates from Taiwan were greeted by the Chinese Health Minister with remarks like "Who cares about you, Taiwan?" or "Who pays attention to you?" Taiwan sends many medical personnel to under-developed countries in Africa and Central and South America. But Taiwan's contribution to the world did not help them gain membership in the WHO. Taiwanese people have suffered greatly because of China's campaign to block them from participating in every international organization.
"The Strait that separate us can never cut off bonds of flesh and blood," Wen said. The US was founded by immigrants who left England. By the same analogy, should the US have remained under the control of the British crown because of bonds of flesh and blood?
Aside from the immigrants from China, Taiwan is more multicultural than Wen realizes. Taiwan has 12 Aboriginal tribes whose ancestry is from the Pacific Ocean side, not from China. More recently, there are immigrants from countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam.
Taiwan needs to have its existence recognized in a "normal" way so that the basic human rights of its citizens will not be sacrificed to international politics. In the meantime, Taiwanese hope their neighbor China will soon become a democratic country so that future generations can decide the course of the country. Any threats from China to take Taiwan into its territory by force will only push overseas Taiwanese extremists to become terrorists.
Alison Hsieh
Athens
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS