On Sept. 12, Hong Kong will hold legislative elections for the second time since the 1997 handover. Voters will express their attitudes toward China's open and unscrupulous interference in the territory's local affairs.
Taiwan will also hold legislative elections at the end of this year. If the green camp can win a majority in the Legislative Yuan, it will be able to resolve the legislative chaos created by pro-China politicians and implement policies and reforms smoothly. Hence, the democratic movements in both Taiwan and Hong Kong are at a crucial juncture.
Under such circumstances, democratic forces in Taiwan and Hong Kong must unite to preserve democracy. This will not only further the welfare of their people, but will also aid China's democratic development, since the political progress of Taiwan and Hong Kong is a positive influence. Unfortunately, cooperation between them remains insufficient due to psychological obstacles.
As Taiwan's democratization and localization are proceeding simultaneously, with excessive attention paid to the latter, the country often ignores globalization, and the development of China and Hong Kong. This is seen in the quantity of local media reports which ignore the special relations between Taiwan and China, which also includes Hong Kong.
Hong Kong must eliminate its bias against Taiwan. A true democrat must respect the Taiwanese people's choice for their future -- unification or independence. The people of Hong Kong do not want to be manipulated by an authoritarian regime either. Canada's province of Quebec was able to hold a referendum on independence, Czechoslovakia was able to split into the Czech Republic and Slovakia in 1993 after the communist forces collapsed, and even East Timor was able to vote for independence from Indonesia. Why can't Taiwan, which has not been occupied by China, remain independent?
Today, Hong Kong's understanding of Taiwan remains unchanged, with media reports about the island being mostly negative. Hong Kong does not understand that even if the development of Taiwan's democratic movement is seriously flawed, it's better than that of Hong Kong, where the people do not have a direct election for the chief executive.
While Beijing often smears the territory's democratic movement as "populism," some Hong Kong democrats echo Taiwan's pro-China figures and do exactly the same to Taiwan. This is sad. Perhaps it is a result of the long-term influence of Taiwan's pro-China media on their Hong Kong counterparts, which have ignored the Taiwanese people's voice.
If the people of Hong Kong can view the situation from the perspective of the changes in the territory's media, in which pro-democratic media have been blocked, they should be able to understand Taiwan's present predicament, especially the media's influence on public opinion.
Freedom of speech in Hong Kong has been limited since the territory's return to China. Particularly, political accusations of treason and spying can be heard almost everywhere, while fake Chinese nationalism grows. Therefore, Taiwan should try to understand the difficult situation faced by Hong Kong's democrats.
On the other hand, while Hong Kong's democrats do not necessarily have to show their support for Taiwanese democracy, it's not necessary for them to attack Taiwan, or make reckless anti-independence and pro-unification remarks. After all, as long as Taiwan is not annexed by China, Beijing will maintain its policy of "one country, two systems," and let Hong Kong continue to serve as an example for Taiwan. This helps the territory avoid rapid sinification.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS