On Sept. 12, Hong Kong will hold legislative elections for the second time since the 1997 handover. Voters will express their attitudes toward China's open and unscrupulous interference in the territory's local affairs.
Taiwan will also hold legislative elections at the end of this year. If the green camp can win a majority in the Legislative Yuan, it will be able to resolve the legislative chaos created by pro-China politicians and implement policies and reforms smoothly. Hence, the democratic movements in both Taiwan and Hong Kong are at a crucial juncture.
Under such circumstances, democratic forces in Taiwan and Hong Kong must unite to preserve democracy. This will not only further the welfare of their people, but will also aid China's democratic development, since the political progress of Taiwan and Hong Kong is a positive influence. Unfortunately, cooperation between them remains insufficient due to psychological obstacles.
As Taiwan's democratization and localization are proceeding simultaneously, with excessive attention paid to the latter, the country often ignores globalization, and the development of China and Hong Kong. This is seen in the quantity of local media reports which ignore the special relations between Taiwan and China, which also includes Hong Kong.
Hong Kong must eliminate its bias against Taiwan. A true democrat must respect the Taiwanese people's choice for their future -- unification or independence. The people of Hong Kong do not want to be manipulated by an authoritarian regime either. Canada's province of Quebec was able to hold a referendum on independence, Czechoslovakia was able to split into the Czech Republic and Slovakia in 1993 after the communist forces collapsed, and even East Timor was able to vote for independence from Indonesia. Why can't Taiwan, which has not been occupied by China, remain independent?
Today, Hong Kong's understanding of Taiwan remains unchanged, with media reports about the island being mostly negative. Hong Kong does not understand that even if the development of Taiwan's democratic movement is seriously flawed, it's better than that of Hong Kong, where the people do not have a direct election for the chief executive.
While Beijing often smears the territory's democratic movement as "populism," some Hong Kong democrats echo Taiwan's pro-China figures and do exactly the same to Taiwan. This is sad. Perhaps it is a result of the long-term influence of Taiwan's pro-China media on their Hong Kong counterparts, which have ignored the Taiwanese people's voice.
If the people of Hong Kong can view the situation from the perspective of the changes in the territory's media, in which pro-democratic media have been blocked, they should be able to understand Taiwan's present predicament, especially the media's influence on public opinion.
Freedom of speech in Hong Kong has been limited since the territory's return to China. Particularly, political accusations of treason and spying can be heard almost everywhere, while fake Chinese nationalism grows. Therefore, Taiwan should try to understand the difficult situation faced by Hong Kong's democrats.
On the other hand, while Hong Kong's democrats do not necessarily have to show their support for Taiwanese democracy, it's not necessary for them to attack Taiwan, or make reckless anti-independence and pro-unification remarks. After all, as long as Taiwan is not annexed by China, Beijing will maintain its policy of "one country, two systems," and let Hong Kong continue to serve as an example for Taiwan. This helps the territory avoid rapid sinification.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS