China's unification tactics are getting increasingly sophisticated. A Ministry of National Defense report revealed that in its desire to achieve unification with Taiwan, China is now targeting the "southern Taiwanese" population using a combination of culture and religion to "improve those people's perspective of China."
The report also pointed out that China was pulling back troops from Dongshan Island, a clear indication that the high-profile military exercises that had been hyped since May were called off. These two pieces of information indicate that China has launched a new strategy in its campaign to unify with Taiwan.
The communist giant is now attempting to get its secondary enemy to destroy its primary enemy. China's greatest enemy is Taiwanese independence, and, at least in the minds of its leaders, democracy and localization are synonymous with independence.
Therefore, its greatest enemies are former president Lee Teng-hui (
For this reason, China originally tried to drive a wedge between the people of Taiwan, and its government. But in 1996, even under the threat of a missile exercise, Lee was elected president, and subsequently in 2000 and 2004, Chen Shui-bian (
Now, China has a new plan in its unification efforts. In the name of cultural and religious integration, it is targeting the people of southern Taiwan, appearing to put aside its belligerent attitude in order to win over their hearts and minds. But as many local officials in the south have pointed out, the consensus is that the future of Taiwan lies in the hands of the majority of Taiwanese people and there is no market for a "Greater China" ideology. If China thinks that by targeting a number of representatives in the south it will be able to makeover its image, then it clearly does not understand the strength of the Taiwan identity among the southern Taiwanese. So, even though China has changed its tactics -- hoping to win over the traditionally "green" and "parochial" southerners -- they are destined to fail.
China's method of luring locals in southern Taiwan over is also useless because the Chinese government still does not understand the true meaning of Taiwan's democracy.
Beijing does not seem to understand that support for unification is dead here. More ridiculously, they seem to believe that pan-green supporters are staunchly pro-independence while pan-blue supporters are staunchly pro-unification.
It is undoubted that a gap between northern and southern Taiwan does exist, as the green camp enjoys strong support in the south, while the blue camp enjoys strong support in the north. But voter support for different political parties are often very different from their positions regarding unification and independence. In fact, we know from past opinion polls that most Taiwanese people desire the maintenance of the status quo in the Taiwan Strait and disagree with China's "one country, two systems" model; while more and more people here consider themselves "Taiwanese," not "Chinese."
Moreover, despite their ideological fighting in the runup to the March presidential election, both the ruling and opposition camps took "loving Taiwan" as the foundation for campaigns. Thus, a local identification has become the mainstream. Voters may support different candidates for various reasons, but their stances regarding unification and independence is not the main factor that affects voting behavior. In other words, supporting Taiwan's democratization and localization is the wish of the majority of Taiwanese people -- except for a group of isolated politicians. Although the Taiwanese people are divided into the green and blue camps during elections, they are actually united when fighting against Chinese hegemony.
To eliminate post-election conflicts, both the ruling and opposition camps have proposed increasing dialogue with each other. The DPP is planning a proposal to resolve issues regarding Taiwan's ethnicity later this month -- with a focus on promoting ethnic diversity and national unity. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) also last month proposed a draft of its new discourse, entitled "a shared local destiny," to strengthen its local identification. Therefore, China's latest united front strategy targeting the southern Taiwanese will never be able to infiltrate and destroy the strong castle of the Taiwanese people's shared destiny.
Thus far, we have been unable to develop positive cross-strait relations and build a win-win situation simply due to China's insistence of annexing Taiwan -- as the former never treats the latter as an equal political entity. No matter how it refines its methods to make them look more attractive, it cannot hide its unificationist ambitions. As such, it is impossible for Beijing to win the Taiwanese people's trust, so its strategies cannot work.
Take China's withdrawal of its military exercise on Dongshan Island for example. If Beijing cannot change its military expansion aimed at Taiwan, the cancelation of a few military exercises is merely an empty gesture, and cross-strait relations will never improve.
The key to improving cross-strait relations lies in whether or not China can treat Taiwan equally, and recognize the country's existence. Notions of eventual unification are an illusion.
Translated by Eddy Chang and Ian Bartholomew
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS