The international community keeps its eyes shut to the fact that there are two distinct entities -- one Taiwan and one China -- and country on each side of the Taiwan Strait.
It is a reality that can no longer be ignored. Continuing to do so jeopardizes peace and security in Asia, which potentially involves Japan, Korea, as well as the US. Many still prefer clinging to a "one China" policy despite differing interpretations among nations.
Domestically, Taiwan desperately tries to make the distinction between Peoples' Republic of China and the Republic of China (ROC), despite the fact that the ROC ceased to exist in the minds of diplomatic communities when it was expelled from the UN in 1971.
Taiwan has experimented with terms like "ROC on Taiwan," "Taiwan is the ROC," "Taiwan equals the ROC," "Taiwan (ROC)," "Taiwan-ROC" and of late "Taiwan, ROC." But no matter what one uses, the reality remains that Taiwan is Taiwan and China is China. Two distinct governments exist.
Despite this, many unification supporters continue clinging to the use of "ROC" in the name of patriotism. They are unwilling to recognize that doing so does more harm than good to the 23 million residents of Taiwan.
At present, the ROC maintains diplomatic relations with fewer than 30 nations, or so-called nations. Even the US, one of Taiwan's staunchest allies, has switched its diplomatic ties from Taiwan to China.
In its place, the US enacted the Taiwan Relations Act. (Note that it is called the Taiwan Relations Act, and not the ROC Relations Act.)
The Taiwan Relations Act has been cited in various contexts to suit various purposes and motives. It has been characterized as everything from worthless to absolutely essential.
Certainly, the Act has its limitations, but it provides adequate protection for Taiwan from foreign invasion. Without it, Taiwan would have been ruled by a communist regime shortly after the US embassy was removed from Taiwan in 1980.
A national referendum must be held as soon as possible to immediately cease the use of the term ROC and use Taiwan instead. The first nationally elected president, Lee Teng-Hui (
To gain international acceptance, a domestic consensus must first be achieved. To begin with, the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office, China Airlines and the like should be renamed to reflect Taiwan.
Popularizing the use of "Taiwan" instead of "ROC" can help distinguish Taiwan from China -- the People's Republic of China.
More importantly, much confusion could be avoided in the international scene. Citizenry around the world readily recognize these two distinctive entities. The government in Taiwan must take a firm stand on using "Taiwan" consistently, and have the perseverance to carry it out.
Wavering between "Taiwan" and "ROC" prolongs the diplomatic isolation between Taiwan and the rest of the world.
Political entities all over the world avoid "ROC" like the plague but are receptive to Taiwan. I am certain Taiwan will be admitted to far more international organizations than the ROC has been.
The Global Alliance for Democracy and Peace was established to promote the peaceful coexistence for both sides of the Strait. Taiwan has been ruled separately since 1895, when it was ceded to Japan.
For peaceful and equal status to continue, distinctive names must be used. We must insist on using "Taiwan" exclusively rather than "ROC" as a part of its name.
We agree there is only one China -- let the mainland natives have it. And let the residents of Taiwan have Taiwan.
Yu-Chong Lin, PhD
Honolulu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS