In East Asia today, a line is gradually being drawn in the water, starting in the sea between Japan and Korea and running south through the East China Sea and the Taiwan Strait into the South China Sea.
East of this line are the US, which has started streamlining its military forces in Asia; Japan, which is shedding the pacifist cocoon in which it wrapped itself after World War II; and Taiwan, which has been quietly expanding military connections with the US.
West of the line are China, swiftly emerging as a military, economic, and political power, and its ally, poverty-stricken but militarily dangerous North Korea. Both want the US to withdraw its forces and influence from Asia.
Where South Korea and the Philippines fit into this formation is open to question. South Korea, driven by anti-Americanism, has been leaning toward China despite disputes with Beijing over ancient history. The Philippines has lost favor with the US after withdrawing its soldiers from Iraq in the face of terrorist blackmail.
Still another question is the role of Russia. While the Russians have been seeking to revive their influence in Asia, diminished after the demise of the Soviet Union in 1991, they have been pre-occupied with problems in European Russia while their Pacific fleet lies rusting at anchor.
No strategic thinker in Washington or Beijing has deliberately drawn this line in the water. Rather it has evolved as a new balance of power in Asia has taken shape. Even so, it is across this line that both sides must manage a strategic competition if it is not to turn into confrontation or open conflict.
Japan's emergence as a sturdy ally appears to have had a subtle effect on US strategic thinking. Japan will become the site of forward headquarters for all four US military services when the Army's I Corps moves from Seattle to Camp Zama, southwest of Tokyo, in the autumn. The Navy, Marines, and Air Force already have headquarters in Japan.
The US plans to add a seventh aircraft carrier to its Pacific fleet as it turns more to sea and air power to maintain a presence in Asia. A larger, nuclear-powered carrier will most likely replace Kitty Hawk, based in Yokosuka, Japan, when that ship retires in 2008.
As the US redeploys forces worldwide, Japan will experience only a slight drawdown although some bases will be consolidated to reduce discord between Japanese and Americans. The main ground contingent to leave Asia will be 12,500 out of 37,000 troops leaving South Korea.
Evidence of the fundamental change in Japan is seen in a new, favorable attitude toward collective defense and moves to revise or reinterpret Article IX, the famed "no-war" clause of the constitution. The deployment of Japanese troops to Iraq has set a precedent and Japan has shown definite interest in joining the US in missile defense.
The catalyst that has caused Japan to shed its postwar cocoon has been North Korea, which has fired missiles over Japan, set about acquiring nuclear arms, and abducted Japanese citizens from their own shores. In addition, Japanese appear to be increasingly wary of Chinese hostility.
In Taiwan, American observers have been sent to observe exercises, to discuss command and control, and to urge Taiwanese forces to work better together. Taiwanese officers occasionally come quietly to Honolulu to meet with the US Pacific Command here.
In the center of this line is the Japanese island of Okinawa, site of US bases that will become more important as this competition unfolds. Lieutenant General Wallace Gregson, who commands US Marines in the Pacific, says the reason is the "tyranny of distance."
"Naha [capital of Okinawa] is closer to Manila and Shanghai than to Tokyo, and closer to Hanoi than to Hokkaido," he says. "No place else is so close to so many other important places, no other single location would permit US forces to carry out their crucial role."
The increasing importance of Okinawa lends urgency to efforts to mitigate frictions generated by incidents like the recent crash of a US helicopter there. No one was killed
but many Okinawans were angered.
US officials have begun looking for new ways to ease anti-base pressures. One possibility: Turn the bases over to Japan and relegate US forces to being tenants. "Japanese and American troops often operate together, deploy together, and live together," says one officer. "We do it on exercises now, and it works. Why not do it when we're in garrison?"
Richard Halloran is a freelance writer based in Hawaii.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS