Johan Pehrson, Chairman of the parliament justice committee, and Axel Darvik, Mia Franzen, Karin Granbom, Anna Gronlund-Krantz, Tobias Gronlund-Krantz, Torkild Strandberg, Cecilia Wigstrom, members of parliament
Swedish Liberal Party
As Liberal Party parliamentarians from Sweden visiting Taiwan, we are learning that there are worries here that some European political leaders are more interested in selling weapons to China than in supporting democracy in Taiwan. We would like to assure the Taiwanese people that there are European politicians sympathetic to their situation and vehemently opposed to any loosening up of the EU embargo banning weapons exports to China.
It is no secret that the French government, one of the most influential in the EU, has not only been pushing to abolish the arms embargo, but has held joint fleet exercises with the Chinese in the Pacific. We recognize that it is in every nation's interest to enjoy good relations with China, but the attitude taken by the French government on this issue exposes a lack of understanding of the perils and threats posed by a huge authoritarian state armed with modern weapons. These weapons can and will be used to threaten, pacify and oppress the Chinese and Taiwanese people. The misjudgement by some European politicians of the dangers of emboldening Chinese expansionism must be resisted.
Therefore, our party regularly brings up the Taiwan issue for debate and pressures the Swedish government to protest Chinese hardline policies. Additionally, liberals in the European parliament constantly oppose the policies, from either left or right, to unnecessarily bow to Chinese pressure.
The Swedish parliament has a Taiwan friendship association numbering 20 percent of all legislators, with members from the government coalition, including the long-ruling social democrats. Members of the association take notice of and bring into the public arena any Swedish government action which is excessively accommodating to China's expansionism or fails to constructively push to expand Taiwan's international space and participation.
It is a historical fact that democracies have never waged war against other democracies. We believe that a democratization of China will definitely secure peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. Democracies thus need to pursue a responsible policy of a good, stable and growing political and economic relationship with China to facilitate that nation's transition to democracy.
Taiwan's success is a natural model for the rest of Asia to emulate in both politics and economics. Taiwan has our admiration for its stubborn perseverance in liberty and democracy and we will continue to push for Taiwan's legitimate interests internationally whenever we can.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS