Recently, my job afforded me the opportunity to contact some old victims of the White Terror era.
One of them said he was extremely excited that Taiwan would be returned to the "motherland" after Japan was defeated in 1945.
He viewed China as his spiritual motherland, saying that nothing could surpass his passion for it.
Those who lived in this country at the time had a greater China consciousness, believing that they were the Han people whose ancestors originally moved from China to Taiwan, and that the "foreign regime" actually referred to the Japanese colonial government. Of course, for the nation's Aborigines, all regimes are foreign regimes.
The notorious 228 Incident in 1947 aroused the Taiwanese people's hostility towards the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) rule.
Throughout the 1960s, the people lived in austere conditions. They could only focus on "increasing production to contribute to the country."
The country was almost cut off from the progressive and anti-war social movements that flourished thought in the West during this period.
After the 1979 Kaohsiung Incident, the opposition tangwai, or those "outside the KMT movement" gradually won public sympathy, and it united with the other social movements in the mid-80s.
A host of environmental, Aboriginal, labor and other social groups came together to oppose the KMT's authoritarian regime. Established in 1986, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) emerged from these forces.
The so-called Taiwan identity also began to take shape, stressing that the public must unite to fight the KMT's regime that oppresses the Taiwanese people.
Towards the end of the late president Chiang Ching-kuo's (
He swept away the obstacles to democratic politics and freedom of speech. His successor, former president Lee Teng-hui (
However, the issue of transitional justice in Taiwan's society was not appropriately handled. Some White Terror victims complain to this day that they should be compensated with the KMT's assets, not taxpayers' money, and that none of the oppressors of the past have been punished.
For them, Lee's apology was not enough, since the matter was unrelated to him.
Since the pan-blue camp's leaders have not seriously dealt with the issue of justice -- even though KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Now that the blue-camp has once again lost the presidency, the they should bravely face the past and clearly define what they believe to be modern Taiwan-China relations.
They should also focus on today's social policy issues, shed the foreign regime label and strive toward the goal of serving the people of Taiwan.
Sun Ming-lin is the project planner of the documentary, Chiang Ching-kuo, produced by the Public Television Service (PTS) Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,