In assessing the state of cross-strait relations, we find the US struggling to maintain the status quo. We find China, within its closed-door system, apparently struggling over whether to strengthen its use of a military threat to resolve the "Taiwan issue," or to use a soft approach to convince Taiwan to succumb. And we find Taiwan, closer than ever to being a separate national entity, struggling with the issue of moving aggressively toward a de jure resolution of its political status or more carefully maintaining the status quo. In this unsettled atmosphere, policies have become outdated and need to be reviewed.
New policy decisions about cross-strait relations are not likely to surface in the present circumstances. The US has presidential and congressional elections a few weeks away and Taiwan has a legislative election a month later. China can change, although it will take longer to discern what effect this will have. Even if there is no change in administration after the US election, there will be reviews on all sides to adjust to the different atmosphere.
China's cross-strait policies have fundamentally not changed, but the very deep change in its own environment has made those policies unsustainable. It has greater influence, but it is also becoming much more dependent on the rest of the world for its markets, capital, resources, information and know-how. It is far less free to do what it pleases. In addition, both the "one China" principle and the "one country, two systems" approach have become unacceptable, not just to the leaders, but also to the people of Taiwan.
Taiwan's transformation of its political system to a democracy is no less spectacular than China's transformation to a market economy. Furthermore, one of the most important pillars of the US-Taiwan relationship in the past was Taiwan's acceptance of maintaining a low profile to refrain from agitating China. This policy continued through the 1990s, when democratization began blossoming. But trying to maintain a low profile in a democracy where political leaders have to deal with voters' wishes was clearly becoming unsustainable. Then president Lee Teng-hui (
In more recent times, there has been some improvement in this bilateral relationship, but finding some way to effectively manage this unique system under the present circumstances and in the long term is still a work in progress. The need to expand exchanges between senior officials on both sides has become especially important.
An effort to address these outdated policies was made in 1994 in the Taiwan Policy Review. The preface explaining the reasons for conducting the review was very well done. It set forth cogently the profound changes that had taken place in Taiwan since the policy had been established 15 years before. The final results did not live up to the stated need, however. Trying to improve relations with China without changing the US' Taiwan policy, a questionable objective, prevailed.
There was never a question of officiality, however, as the US was committed to maintaining an unofficial relationship until such time as the two sides could resolve the issue of Taiwan's political status.
But the need to find ways to enhance high-level contacts in a relationship that was becoming increasingly broad and sophisticated was not met, and neither was the need to address the impact on Taiwan of the changing architecture of security, or the need for Taiwan's participation in the international community. But the momentum of its growing democracy continued nonetheless. The latter part of the 1990s saw the beginning of direct elections at all levels, the missile crisis in 1996 which awakened many to the changes and Lee's "special state-to-state" proposal, all signs of a different Taiwan developing in a different atmosphere.
Then came 2000. The change of government to a very different political party that had few resources and no experience of governing, and was faced with a hostile legislature, made progress in all areas very difficult. But during the four years that followed -- in which the Chinese government seriously erred in refusing to deal with the new rulers -- the political profile of the people in Taiwan changed dramatically. A consensus on Taiwan's identity has become closer to unity than ever before, and it is a Taiwanese identity that has emerged. The results of this year's presidential election demonstrated this.
In my judgment, there are three imperatives that need to be addressed: first a meaningful change in the US' rules of engagement. In 2000, the US administration changed as well. In terms of the US' relationship with Taiwan, it was more forthcoming than any US administration since the switch in recognition to China in 1979. But with the changing political atmosphere in Taiwan, the US "rules of engagement," which have in any event been overtaken, now face an increasingly urgent challenge that must be addressed.
If the US wants to support Taiwan's democratic system while working to prevent catastrophe ensuing from its differences with China, it must find a new set of rules for its "unofficial relationship." It must deal with Taiwan without supporting either side's claim to sovereignty. It must treat the Taiwanese government as legitimate and responsible to its people, and conduct its relationship with the country's leaders accordingly.
Second, in developing a more realistic relationship with Taiwan, democratic countries should increase pressure on China to better understand a Taiwan that is indeed different, and to develop more realistic proposals for resolving China's differences with Taiwan.
Third, an important domestic challenge for Taiwan, with its popular democracy based on the will of the people, is to develop an understanding of the dangers as well as the opportunities posed by deciding what Taiwan's future should be. The US has clearly and often reiterated that under Taiwan's democratic system, it will accept the consent of the people of Taiwan. The people must understand the responsibility they have in making such decisions.
Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and is now a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. The views expressed in this article are his own.
It is employment pass renewal season in Singapore, and the new regime is dominating the conversation at after-work cocktails on Fridays. From September, overseas employees on a work visa would need to fulfill the city-state’s new points-based system, and earn a minimum salary threshold to stay in their jobs. While this mirrors what happens in other countries, it risks turning foreign companies away, and could tarnish the nation’s image as a global business hub. The program was announced in 2022 in a bid to promote fair hiring practices. Points are awarded for how a candidate’s salary compares with local peers, along
China last month enacted legislation to punish —including with the death penalty — “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists.” The country’s leaders, including Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), need to be reminded about what the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has said and done in the past. They should think about whether those historical figures were also die-hard advocates of Taiwanese independence. The Taiwanese Communist Party was established in the Shanghai French Concession in April 1928, with a political charter that included the slogans “Long live the independence of the Taiwanese people” and “Establish a republic of Taiwan.” The CCP sent a representative, Peng
Japan and the Philippines on Monday signed a defense agreement that would facilitate joint drills between them. The pact was made “as both face an increasingly assertive China,” and is in line with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr’s “effort to forge security alliances to bolster the Philippine military’s limited ability to defend its territorial interests in the South China Sea,” The Associated Press (AP) said. The pact also comes on the heels of comments by former US deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger, who said at a forum on Tuesday last week that China’s recent aggression toward the Philippines in
The Ministry of National Defense on Tuesday announced that the military would hold its annual Han Kuang exercises from July 22 to 26. Military officers said the exercises would feature unscripted war games, and a decentralized command and control structure. This year’s exercises underline the recent reforms in Taiwan’s military as it transitions from a top-down command structure to one where autonomy is pushed down to the front lines to improve decisionmaking and adaptability. Militaries around the world have been observing and studying Russia’s war in Ukraine. They have seen that the Ukrainian military has been much quicker to adapt to