From the "Republic of China" (ROC), which includes China and Mongolia, the "ROC on Taiwan," and even the "ROC is Taiwan," to "Taiwan, ROC" -- officially used by Premier Yu Shyi-kun during his recent three-country Central American tour -- there is no other country like Taiwan, which has constantly proposed new national titles.
These proposals of a national title show that Taiwan is at a historical crossroads, with the nation facing the question of what name can truly represent the country's people while demonstrating its sovereignty. At the opening of this year's Olympic Games, Taiwan's team once again marched into the stadium under the ridiculous name of "Chinese Taipei," proving that the ROC in fact exists in name only.
Taiwan has translated "Chinese Taipei" as "Chunghua [Chinese] Taipei" (
China, as well as the rest of the world, refuses to recognize the name "ROC." Even Taiwan itself is unable to use this name sometimes, although many people in Taiwan are still upholding this empty and useless national title to this day.
After the premier's diplomatic trip, Minister of Foreign Affairs Mark Chen (
Changing Taiwan's national title in order to get rid of the bizarre name of the ROC is the correct approach, considering the reality of the situation and the willingness of the majority of Taiwanese people. Not to mention that the dominant force behind the change comes from Taiwan itself. The key to the issue lies in whether Taiwan's leaders and its people have the courage and confidence to righteously promote the nation in the rest of the world with the help of public support under the name "Taiwan" -- which is already familiar in the international arena, and has been linked to democracy as well as prosperity.
Cao Changqing is a writer based in New York.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS