Under heavy social pressure, the Legislative Yuan passed the constitutional amendment bill on legislative reform in the extra session on Monday. Starting in 2008, the nation will adopt a "single-member district, two-vote system" for legislative elections, and current number of seats in the legislature will be cut from the current 225 to 113.
Despite several hurdles, including the readjustment of electoral constituencies, the result was by no means a watershed in the shaping of the nation's future political landscape or a test of the maturation of Taiwan's political culture.
In theory, the new electoral system is beneficial to larger parties because it creates a "winner-takes-all" effect. Nevertheless, it is too early to say whether it would produce a regular two-party system, because more efforts will have to be made in the follow-up constitutional re-engineering and constituency re-structuring. But it opens a window of opportunity to purify and improve the legislature.
For decades, Taiwan's unique single non-transferable vote system has been a political tumor to the country's democratic pro-cess. It not only breeds the growth of "black gold" politics but also encourages an unhealthy legislative culture. The constant antics and shameless grandstanding have made the Legislative Yuan little more than a political circus full of clowns. The media plays a supplementary role in encouraging such misconduct. Most media reports have played up the antagonism between the ruling and opposition parties. To attract more of the spotlight, it is natural for legislators to seek any kind of media exposure, regardless of the kind of exposure they attract.
These elements contribute to a lack of discipline and efficiency in the Legislative Yuan. Several public opinion polls indicated that people think the legislature is a major source of political instability in this country. Further, the majority of the public also supported the reduction of seats in that arm of government.
Now that legislative revisions have taken place and the electoral system has been reformed, the aim is to expand each legislator's legitimacy. But institutional reform is one thing; how to mold the nation into a mature political culture is another. It constitutes an even more urgent task for the state of politics in this country.
To help make the legislature more transparent, a legitimate and fair civil association composed of experts, academics, media and opinion leaders must be formed to monitor legislators' performance. The media should also refrain from sensationalizing press conferences called by certain legislators who exploit the media or to try to excuse themselves from political wrongdoing. The local press should weigh on its own in the commercial interests and the responsibility to educate the public on what is politically right and wrong.
Finally, as the electorate has become more opinionated and aware, distrust of politicians, parties, and all institutions has become more profound. This underlying shift in the elector-ate's mood will constitute a new demand for public represen-tation. The right to hold referendums should be preserved as a supplementary tool in times of legislative inefficiency.
Further electoral reform is a must. A partisan agreement on the constitutional amendment on electoral rules should be treated as a great step forward for Taiwan's democracy, rather than just a political agreement of partisan interests. Reform-minded political leaders with broad visions for the nation's political development should step out and take the lead, regardless of what the reforms may in turn hurt them in the short term or what party they are affiliated with.
Liu Kuan-teh is a political commentator based in Taipei.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS