Politics can be vulgar and dirty, but it can also be clean. A government can be autocratic and corrupt, but it can also be democratic and open, and look after its land and people. Similarly, our politicians can be sincere, honest, selfless and devoted.
A successful statesman does not necessarily have a high position, great fame or incomparable achievements. But he must possess certain admirable characteristics.
In recent years, I often talk about the story of a great statesman who is unknown in this country and has been forgotten by many in his motherland.
The true statesman that I highly respect is Leon Blum, who became the leader of the French Socialist Party before World War II broke out.
Blum was a lawyer, poet and art critic when he was young. Driven by his personal commitment to justice and equality and his love for human beings, he became a politician. In 1936 he also became the first socialist prime minister of France.
Later during World War II, Germany took over France and quickly established the Vichy government (1940-1944), which collaborated with Nazi Germany. Blum refused to recognize this puppet government, and turned down others' advice to temporarily leave the country.
He said that since he was once a public figure who was in charge of the public affairs of France, he should not leave the country then because he once represented France in the eyes of the world.
This admirable sentiment landed him in a Nazi prison.
After the war, the French people enthusiastically debated their political future, to decide whether to adopt a presidential, cabinet or semi-presidential system.
But this respectful statesman only told them sincerely and earnestly: France's biggest problem is the decline of political ethics, not the poor political system.
Political ethics is not the cultivation of one's personal habits. It is the deep understanding of the fact that politics is the handling of public affairs, the commitment to fulfill one's political obligation and the guts to take political responsibilities.
A politician must ask him or herself at all times: Is my every word and deed based on public interest? Am I improving public welfare? Am I carrying out my political obligations, and taking political responsibility?
Have I done my utmost to overcome my personal weaknesses, such as cowardice, laziness, vanity, greed and an obsession with power?
When my own weaknesses damage public interest, have I irresponsibly covered up or even beautified these weaknesses with some impressive but empty words?
In Taiwan, the one-party autocracy that ruled for five decades ended in 2000. It was a significant change in the development of the country's democracy, and troubles were certainly inevitable.
Recently, however, many politicians have shown a disregard for right and wrong, and engaged in shocking and vicious struggles that trample on public welfare.
Some blame this on the poor design of the nation's constitutional system. But in fact, the root of the problem lies in the corrupt minds and chaotic values created by long-term autocratic rule, under which the Taiwanese people had neither the intention nor ability to monitor and pressure politicians.
As a result, politicians flout ethics and recklessly play power games to fulfill their selfish desires.
In this chaotic situation, I deeply hope that all of us can be inspired by Blum's words and deeds.
Lin I-hsiung is a former chairman of the DPP.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS