In an attempt to jump-start pan-green cooperation, President Chen Shui-bian (
Chen praised the TSU lavishly for its consistent embrace of the nation's mainstream values, for safeguarding Taiwanese identity and for playing a competent role as the "loyal opposition." He called for a joint effort to help the government do a better job and to lead the nation away from constant political wrangling.
Chen's latest message has significant implications. First, it appeals to the pan-green candidates to make the political pie big enough to share, by highlighting the importance of vote distribution among pan-green supporters. It also foresees an inevitable competition between the DPP and the TSU under the current electoral system. But it also holds out hope that both sides can minimize division within the pan-green camp.
Compared to their pan-blue counterparts, pan-green members have a shot at consolidating a majority in the Legislative Yuan. However, the party's contesting election strategies and campaign appeals naturally cause frictions within the camp.
The nation's unique single non-transferable voting system means that candidates compete with contenders from both the opponent parties and their own party. Such rules of the game facilitate intra-party frictions if there is no strict party discipline or coordinated nomination strategy.
The greatest challenge to TSU-DPP collaboration is that the TSU also draws most of its support from southern Taiwan. To broaden their base of support, both the DPP and the TSU must come up with a better designed system of vote allocation.
Moreover, the differences between the DPP and TSU on key issues could affect voters' party affiliation. Being characterized as a more left wing and Taiwan-centered fundamentalist political force, the TSU has made the enacting of a new constitution and a new name for Taiwan its main campaign appeals to the voters. As a smaller party, it is understandable that the TSU will want to develop its own campaign slogan and distinct appeal.
The DPP, on the contrary, has stuck with a more incremental constitutional reengineering process in accordance with the current ROC Constitution -- as outlined by Chen in his inauguration address. In light of the sensitivity of the US-Taiwan-China relationship, the DPP must convince both international and domestic audiences it will take a cautious approach in dealing with constitutional issues.
But can these two parties cooperate with each other on the process of constitutional revision? To what extent can Chen and his party allay concerns -- especially from the US -- that he's not just engaging in a "good cop, bad cop" routine?
Although the DPP has not yet revealed its concrete steps towards constitutional reform, the ruling party will probably incorporate a more moderate method of dealing with constitutional issues. By doing so, it helps the ruling party differentiate its candidates from TSU candidates.
Furthermore, the DPP should utilize its governmental resources and the gradually recovering economy as driving forces to boost its own campaign momentum. The key goals laid out by Chen in his inaugural speech -- the promotion of ethnic harmony, the establishment of peaceful cross-strait relations and the build-up of a mature civil society -- are the fundamentals of the DPP platform.
In order to achieve those goals, better and more detailed techniques of vote distribution should be adopted by the pan-green camp.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS