Senator John Kerry, I respect you and I share many of your visions, but this Democratic platform is not good enough: I expect a brighter, more bold vision from you.
The US Democratic Party held its convention in Boston, and selected Kerry and Senator John Edwards as its candidates for the November presidential election. In the platform that the party adopted, "Our Plan for America: Stronger at Home, Respected in the World" the convention reiterated the "one China" policy, re-emphasized the need for a peaceful resolution (rightly so) and restated the US commitment to provide Taiwan with defensive arms.
Reiterating the worn-out "one China" mantra does not do justice to the tremendous political transition that Taiwan has gone through during the past 30 years: three decades ago, there were two regimes claiming to be the rightful government of China: the Communist regime in Beijing and Chiang Kai-shek's (蔣介石) Chinese Nationalist regime in Taipei. The international community was forced to make a choice between the two, and recognized Beijing as the government representing China. Chiang's government obviously did not represent China, and indeed did not even represent the Taiwanese people.
Since then, however, Taiwanese people have brought about human rights and democracy in Taiwan. Only since 1996 have the people of Taiwan been able to elect their president. The fundamental difference between 30 years ago and the present time is that the government in Taipei does not claim to represent China anymore, but has -- through the democratic process -- established its legitimacy as the government of Taiwan.
This fundamental difference requires a significant shift in US policy -- and the policy of other nations around the world as well: Yes, there is "one China" -- the PRC with its government in Beijing -- but there is also "one Taiwan" -- with its government in Taipei -- that deserves recognition as a full and equal member of the international community.
The rulers in Beijing need to realize that the "new" Taiwan is not its "rival" -- a dimwitted and totally outdated concept which continues to be perpetuated by newswires such as AP, UPI and Reuters. The government in Taipei has stated clearly that it wants to live in peace with all of its neighbors, including China, so it is not China's "rival."
The international community needs to realize that Taiwan did not "split off from China," an equally silly misconception we see written time and again by AP, UPI and Reuters. Taiwan was not part of China in the first place: it was a Japanese colony, occupied by the losing side of the Chinese Civil War, and its people were subjected to some 40 years of martial law.
Senator Kerry, Taiwanese people of course favor a peaceful resolution. They don't want US soldiers to die in a conflict in the Taiwan Strait. But it must be clear that a peaceful resolution can only be achieved if the US stands firm in the face of China's aggression. It would be a good first step if you would give a clear signal to China that its 550 missiles aimed at Taiwan and its threatening language and military moves are totally unacceptable. The weak-kneed "strategic ambiguity" as practiced by former president Bill Clinton will only embolden China's bullying against Taiwan. Thus, something like US President George W. Bush's "whatever it takes" isn't so bad after all.
But that is not good enough. Senator Kerry needs to adopt some out-of-the-box thinking. The "status quo" is a dead-end street, which only perpetuates decades-old hostilities stemming from a Chinese Civil War in which most Taiwanese people had no part.
Taiwan would like the US to go back to the San Francisco Peace Treaty of 1951 to 1952, concluded between the Allied Forces and Japan, when Japan ceded sovereignty over Taiwan. But it was not decided to whom the sovereignty of the country was to be given. It was stated that "the future status of Taiwan is to be determined in due time, in accord with the purposes and principles of the UN as laid down in the Charter of the UN." Taiwan's international status was left undetermined.
The US -- and other members of the world community -- should keep the promise made at San Francisco. That treaty was and remains the only international treaty dealing with Taiwan's status. Any communique concluded between other governments (including the US and China) without any democratic representation of the Taiwanese people should in no way have any bearing on the future of Taiwan.
Senator Kerry, you should remain faithful to the basic principles on which the US was founded and support life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for the people of Taiwan through normalization of relations between the US and Taiwan. Many countries will follow your example, and China will come to the realization that peaceful coexistence between the two nations is in its interest.
Chen Mei-chin is editor of Taiwan Communique, an international publication established in Washington.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS