The Athens Olympic Organizing Committee has ordered the removal of Taiwan's advertising for the Olympic Games in Athens. This is not an isolated incident, and it once again highlights the international injustices Taiwan has to endure.
The Government Information Office (GIO) proceeded cautiously when outsourcing this advertising campaign. In addition to GIO Vice Director Lee Cher-jean (
After the GIO awarded the tender, amendments to the original proposal were made at several meetings before the deal was sealed. During this process, creativity took a back seat to the effort to remain within the constraints of the regulations laid down by the Olympic Organizing Committee. In accordance with the "Olympic format," the country's team is called "Chinese Taipei," the flag and team logo feature a plum flower and the team's song is the National Flag Song.
According to the nation's agreement with the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the above Olympic format will be binding in venues for competition, training, meetings and ceremonies related to the games, in the athletes' village, in accommodations for other participants and VIPs, and on all documents, manuals, materials and broadcasting. But -- also according to the agreement -- the Olympic format is in principle not binding in places other than the venues described above.
The items that the GIO designed for the Olympics include giant billboard near the airport, pushcarts at the airport, bus ads, ad boards in the audience stands and fan items such as temporary tattoos, cheer sticks and fan hats.
In principle, not one of these things violates the so-called Olympic format, and they could all make use of the name "Taiwan" instead of the far-fetched "Chinese Taipei." To avoid any disturbances, however, the GIO, cautiously and humbly, stuck with "Chinese Taipei." Who would have expected that after that, they still would suffer such censorship?
The reason given by the Athens Olympic Organizing Committee for removing Taiwan's ads from airport push carts, buses and giant billboards was that the content did not comply with the Olympic theme. These three kinds of ads (push carts, buses, giant billboards) all show a line of athletes at the starting blocks.
The photograph is suitable, and the text reads "Chinese Taipei on the Starting Line!" Another line reads "To the Top! Chinese Taipei," yet another standard cheer. How can this not comply with the Olympic theme?
The reason for this humiliating, belittling "Olympic format" is that after China took over Taiwan's UN seat in 1971 and diplomatic relations were severed with Japan and the US, the relationships between Taiwan's Olympic Committee and most national Olympic Committees were broken off. This continued until 1981, when Taiwan signed the "Olympic format" agreement with the IOC. Regret-tably, the nation's representatives did not insist on the name "Taiwan," and instead walked into the "one China trap" by agreeing to use the name "Chinese Taipei."
It's not that the country has lacked the opportunity to use the name "Taiwan." In the 1952 Olympic Games in Helsinki, the organizers of the basketball competition demanded that our team use the name "Taiwan." The team, however, on orders from the central government, pulled out -- following the principle that "the world isn't big enough for two Chinas."
In 1954, when the IOC held its 49th annual meeting in Athens, they voted to accept two Chinese Olympic committees. In 1959, when the committee held its annual meeting in Munich, Germany, it was decided that "because the Olympic Committee located in Taipei, Taiwan, cannot control sports activities in all China, it cannot be recognized under the name the `Chinese Olympic Committee,' and it will be stricken from the list of countries recognized by the IOC. If the said Olympic Committee wants to apply for recognition under another name, the IOC will consider such an application separately."
When our national Olympic committee applied for recognition as the Republic of China Olympic Committee, the application was denied. Another application was submitted in 1960, but the IOC was of the opinion that the territory under the nation's control only encompassed the Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu, and suggested that the name "Taiwan" or "Formosa" be used. Then-president Chiang Kai-shek (
Is the use of "Taiwan" really such a serious matter? After Japan's Olympic Committee used the name "Taiwan" instead of "the Republic of China" during the 1964 Tokyo Olympic Games, Taiwanese students directed by the government launched a "five noes anti-Japanese protest" -- no to Japanese movies, no to Japanese music, no to speaking Japanese, no to reading Japanese books, and no to buying Japanese goods -- showing some of the confusion and stupidity of Chiang's view of international affairs.
The fact that the nation's ads have now been removed despite the use of the name "Chinese Taipei" only further highlights the necessity for the country to achieve the status of a regular nation. To reach that goal, the first step is to correct Taiwan's title.
Cheng Tzu-leong is an advertising professor at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS