The Athens Olympic Organizing Committee has ordered the removal of Taiwan's advertising for the Olympic Games in Athens. This is not an isolated incident, and it once again highlights the international injustices Taiwan has to endure.
The Government Information Office (GIO) proceeded cautiously when outsourcing this advertising campaign. In addition to GIO Vice Director Lee Cher-jean (
After the GIO awarded the tender, amendments to the original proposal were made at several meetings before the deal was sealed. During this process, creativity took a back seat to the effort to remain within the constraints of the regulations laid down by the Olympic Organizing Committee. In accordance with the "Olympic format," the country's team is called "Chinese Taipei," the flag and team logo feature a plum flower and the team's song is the National Flag Song.
According to the nation's agreement with the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the above Olympic format will be binding in venues for competition, training, meetings and ceremonies related to the games, in the athletes' village, in accommodations for other participants and VIPs, and on all documents, manuals, materials and broadcasting. But -- also according to the agreement -- the Olympic format is in principle not binding in places other than the venues described above.
The items that the GIO designed for the Olympics include giant billboard near the airport, pushcarts at the airport, bus ads, ad boards in the audience stands and fan items such as temporary tattoos, cheer sticks and fan hats.
In principle, not one of these things violates the so-called Olympic format, and they could all make use of the name "Taiwan" instead of the far-fetched "Chinese Taipei." To avoid any disturbances, however, the GIO, cautiously and humbly, stuck with "Chinese Taipei." Who would have expected that after that, they still would suffer such censorship?
The reason given by the Athens Olympic Organizing Committee for removing Taiwan's ads from airport push carts, buses and giant billboards was that the content did not comply with the Olympic theme. These three kinds of ads (push carts, buses, giant billboards) all show a line of athletes at the starting blocks.
The photograph is suitable, and the text reads "Chinese Taipei on the Starting Line!" Another line reads "To the Top! Chinese Taipei," yet another standard cheer. How can this not comply with the Olympic theme?
The reason for this humiliating, belittling "Olympic format" is that after China took over Taiwan's UN seat in 1971 and diplomatic relations were severed with Japan and the US, the relationships between Taiwan's Olympic Committee and most national Olympic Committees were broken off. This continued until 1981, when Taiwan signed the "Olympic format" agreement with the IOC. Regret-tably, the nation's representatives did not insist on the name "Taiwan," and instead walked into the "one China trap" by agreeing to use the name "Chinese Taipei."
It's not that the country has lacked the opportunity to use the name "Taiwan." In the 1952 Olympic Games in Helsinki, the organizers of the basketball competition demanded that our team use the name "Taiwan." The team, however, on orders from the central government, pulled out -- following the principle that "the world isn't big enough for two Chinas."
In 1954, when the IOC held its 49th annual meeting in Athens, they voted to accept two Chinese Olympic committees. In 1959, when the committee held its annual meeting in Munich, Germany, it was decided that "because the Olympic Committee located in Taipei, Taiwan, cannot control sports activities in all China, it cannot be recognized under the name the `Chinese Olympic Committee,' and it will be stricken from the list of countries recognized by the IOC. If the said Olympic Committee wants to apply for recognition under another name, the IOC will consider such an application separately."
When our national Olympic committee applied for recognition as the Republic of China Olympic Committee, the application was denied. Another application was submitted in 1960, but the IOC was of the opinion that the territory under the nation's control only encompassed the Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu, and suggested that the name "Taiwan" or "Formosa" be used. Then-president Chiang Kai-shek (
Is the use of "Taiwan" really such a serious matter? After Japan's Olympic Committee used the name "Taiwan" instead of "the Republic of China" during the 1964 Tokyo Olympic Games, Taiwanese students directed by the government launched a "five noes anti-Japanese protest" -- no to Japanese movies, no to Japanese music, no to speaking Japanese, no to reading Japanese books, and no to buying Japanese goods -- showing some of the confusion and stupidity of Chiang's view of international affairs.
The fact that the nation's ads have now been removed despite the use of the name "Chinese Taipei" only further highlights the necessity for the country to achieve the status of a regular nation. To reach that goal, the first step is to correct Taiwan's title.
Cheng Tzu-leong is an advertising professor at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS