Briton Sir Ernest Benn (1875-1954) once stated, "Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy." Benn's words very well describe the crusade Taiwan's pan-blues have entertained since President Chen Shui-bian (
Since that fateful day, the pan-blues have held that the assassination attempt was a scam, that there were irregularities in the ballot count, that huge numbers of military personnel were kept from voting, that the invalid ballot count was suspiciously high, and that therefore the March 20 presidential elections should be nullified.
A fancy pamphlet titled "Bulletgate" has been distributed throughout the US in an attempt to win hearts and minds to the pan-blue cause. Instead of the desired outcome, however, the pan-blue diatribe has people in Washington shaking their heads.
Instead of winning over the US Congress, the think tank world and the media with "Bulletgate" the pan-blue alliance is playing Russian roulette with its own credibility. Not only has the pamphlet turned out to be an inappropriate lobby ploy, it is an embarrassment for the nation that this internal political affair was brought into US politics by the pan-blues.
The day after the publication landed in US congressional offices, we at the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) received a copy sent to us by a Congressional office, accompanied by the comment of a staffer saying: "This is an example of how NOT to lobby."
The 2000 US presidential election was hotly contested and was finally decided by a Supreme Court vote. While many Democrats believe to this day that Al Gore should have been declared president, the whole country decided to move forward and accept the rule of law as underscored by the Supreme Court.
US politicians and policy makers understand that Chen and his Democratic Progressive Party are committed to the rule of law and have consistently refused to use the illegal, unconstitutional means that the pan-blue alliance has suggested to resolve the 2004 election disputes. Such non-constitutional means have included asking Chen to declare a state of emergency -- which to all intents and purposes means martial law -- and using the huge powers such a declaration would give him to order a recount on his own initiative rather than use the constitutionally established procedure.
The US emphasis on the rule of law has been loud and clear, and US policymakers have shown that they trust Chen to carry out his legal responsibilities.
On March 26, the White House released a statement congratulating Chen and the people of Taiwan on the "successful conclusion of their March 20 presidential election."
The statement continued, "We recognize that there are pending legal challenges to the results of the March 20 election. We applaud the people of Taiwan for embracing established legal mechanisms and rejecting extra-legal options to resolve their differences. We reject calls for violence, which threaten the very democratic principles to which we and the people of Taiwan are committed."
At an April 21 hearing on the Taiwan Relations Act, Representative Dan Burton asked a series of questions regarding the election -- about the investigation into the shooting incident and the number of military personnel who were allegedly kept from voting. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia James Kelly gave a clear response: "[Our] view is essentially, these are questions that the people and the institutions of Taiwan are more than capable of resolving for themselves. And our view is that the process is proceeding in which these questions are going to be resolved in a legitimate and appropriate way."
When Burton again asked about an investigation into the shooting, Kelly was even more forceful.
"Even assuming that the inauguration goes ahead on May 20, this coming December there's going to be elections for the Legislative Yuan, for the legislative body. This is going to provide another opportunity for the people of Taiwan to make their views known. So there is a system of checks and balances going on there," he said.
In short, move forward and stop whining.
On June 24, House International Relations Committee Chairman Henry Hyde introduced and passed resolution HCR462, the 25th Anniversary of the Taiwan Relations Act. The reason Hyde waited until June to introduce and pass the resolution was because he wanted to wait until the commotion surrounding Taiwan's election was over. Obviously, Hyde, along with the rest of the US Congress, had determined that Chen would be Taiwan's president for the next four years.
Five days after the passage of the TRA resolution though, the pan-blue lobbyists were still not ready to give up. Having exhausted interest in their conspiracy theory at home in Taiwan, they decided to renew their effort to take their slanderous campaign to the other side of the Pacific. As early as April, the pan-blues had begun to publish advertisements in American newspapers such as the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times and the Capitol Hill magazine The Hill. But when these ads seemed to fall on deaf ears, they decided to start distributing their "Bulletgate" pamphlet on Capitol Hill -- a glossy brochure full of unsubstantiated accusations.
Some in the pan-blue camp might say that they are simply lobbying for a cause on Capitol Hill, something that we at FAPA have done for over 20 years now. The crucial difference is that FAPA has always lobbied for US support for democracy for all the people of Taiwan. We have never attacked persons or political parties to score partisan points. When FAPA was established over 20 years ago, Taiwan was under martial law and under the rule of a dictatorship. So FAPA has always brought out into the open the issues of human rights and personal and political freedoms, enabling the US to help the people of Taiwan regain their voice.
By distributing their "Bulletgate" pamphlet on Capitol Hill, the pan-blues are playing partisan politics on foreign grounds. They attack the president and his party, and thus all the president's supporters. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has never refrained from hanging dirty laundry in public in a foreign country for the rest of the world to see. On Oct. 20, 2003 for instance, in a speech at a Heritage Foundation/American Enterprise Institute sponsored luncheon in Washington DC, KMT Chairman Lien Chan(
Lien fed his American audience the line that, unlike Chen, Lien himself would not be a "troublemaker," once elected and that he would be "more discreet and prudent," that he would "not add another crisis" to the security problems in East Asia.
In his speech, Lien offered not one word of criticism of the PRC. And not one word about the more than 500 Chinese missiles in Fujian Province pointed at Taiwan.
Lien's speech and the "Bulletgate" affair have sullied the KMT/PFP alliance's reputation in Washington, not that of Chen and the pan-green coalition.
Clearly, Bulletgate has missed the mark.
Ming-chi Wu is president of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS