As soon as he came back from his one-month trip abroad, People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
They harped on the same old tune of combining their two parties.
This shows that Soong simply doesn't get it and that his way of thinking is obsolete.
Though the two party leaders met and decided to work together for the presidential election only a year and five months ago, the circumstances now are different.
Lien is no longer as powerful as he was; neither is the PFP.
Back then, Lien possessed such enormous power and financial resources that no one could challenge him, and the PFP had not yet begun to decline.
Thus as soon as Lien and Soong held their private talk, a merger between the two parties should have been a done deal.
At that time, the leadership in the pan-blue alliance was invincible.
Now, Lien is nothing more than a rubber stamp.
Though he kept his post as KMT chairman after he lost the presidential election, he will have to step down following the legislative election at the end of this year.
In the meantime, the PFP has lost momentum because of the sliding popularity of Soong.
Therefore, Lien and Soong were indulging in self-delusion by holding a private meeting again, since they are no longer in a position to make any policies or merger deals.
Even if they did, these policies and deals would likely be ineffective.
KMT Vice Chairman Wang Jin-pyng (
In Wang's view, there is no point in even talking about a merger, let alone forming one.
Wang's comment made Lien's rubber-stamp status obvious. Lien doesn't even have a say in his party. If Soong didn't know this, then he was simply incapable of assessing the situation.
He probably thought that nothing had changed over the past year and that he could still control the KMT by allying with Lien. That's how outmoded his thinking is.
The most powerful figure in the KMT now appears to be Wang. Not daring to challenge him, Lien goes along with what he says.
During a visit to former president Lee Teng-hui (
Obviously, he said this to please Lee.
In an interview with a Hong Kong radio station, Lien didn't criticize Wang at all; on the contrary, he played up to him by saying that "in Wang's view, the KMT has to get as much support as it can."
And when he says "support" he's referring to former president Lee.
But since Lien already publicly denounced Lee and cut all ties with him, why did he suddenly welcome Lee's support?
Even though far away on a visit to New York, Wang made comments to express his gratitude to Lee.
Though he likely did not intend to embarrass Lien, clearly in his eyes the former chairman far overshadows the current one.
Now Soong can only bluff Lien. Lien lost his power and Soong is at his wit's end.
The sad thing is that these two out-of-date figures still do not understand and appreciate political reality.
They are not as smart and calculating as we once thought.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Jennie Shih
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS