Ever since 2000, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) have been unable to accept the fact that Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was elected president. Since he won with just 40 percent of the vote, they focused on the fact that KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) had together won more votes. In this way they denied losing the election. This was a warning of the anti-democratic mania that has continued to affect them.
For example, when it rained during a pan-blue protest outside the Presidential Office after Chen was re-elected, claims were made that Chen had asked the Air Force to dump water from above. They said the assassination attempt on Chen the day before the election was staged by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
In the areas where the DPP vote count was high, there was also a higher proportion of invalid ballots. This should mean that many DPP supporters lost the opportunity to vote for their party. But the pan-blue camp found someone at the Academia Sinica to say that the high number of invalid ballots was incontrovertible proof of vote-fixing.
This verges on hysteria. And when transmitted through the media, it has forced Taiwanese society into a state of intellectual paralysis. (Even forensic scientist Henry Lee's report, in which the pan-blue camp had put so much faith, was rejected because it was "intellectually impartial.") Now the pan-blue camp has, with the assistance of numerous retired diplomats, published a pamphlet titled Bulletgate, which it used to air its paranoid suspicions to the Americans.
This is a scene worthy of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. No wonder that former DPP chairman Hsu Hsin-liang (
There are other examples. One pro-unification newspaper had as a front-page headline: "Three DPP heavyweights take NT$30 million in bribes." That news proved to be false. Another paper reported that the Ministry of Finance would introduce a capital gains tax for the stock market. The news caused a drop in stock prices before it was also proved false.
A PFP legislator made accusations about government subsidies of NT$1.84 million for a building called the "President's Official Residence." Later it came to light that the subsidy was perfectly legitimate and was earmarked for an apartment building in Nantou named "President's Official Residence" that had been damaged in an earthquake. Now that over 70 percent of public expression is controlled by such "journalists," there will be few quiet days.
Opponents of democracy will come and go, but the pro-unification media is always there to do their work. Why is this? The media is a privileged field dominated by a small number of families -- and the media reject the idea of Taiwanese being in control of Taiwan. Although there is now plenty of talk about media freedom, a large portion of the media still consist of these same people and they continue to maintain the "old order."
Former president Lee Teng-hui (
Lao Pao is a political commentator.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS