KMT misses another chance
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) missed an opportunity to come to terms with its past. It complained that the scheduled legislative election date of Dec. 11, one day after the 25th anniversary of the Kaohsiung Incident, was politically motivated to benefit the Democratic Progressive Party and harms the chances of its legislative candidates.
Therefore, it urged that the day be changed to the traditional last Saturday of November or first Saturday of December. The complaint itself is a self-fulfilling prophesy. Raising the issue focused voters' attention on the KMT's past persecution of democracy advocates, and thereby reminded voters of its unsavory past.
In this sense, the KMT and its candidates are already prejudiced. Instead of focusing on winning the election by crying foul, the KMT should use the anniversary to come clean by admitting its past mistakes while taking the initiative to disclose the truth about the White Terror era and the 228 Incident.
A willingness to confront its past, to ask voters for forgiveness and to reconcile with its past will help it win votes. Bickering won't. Objecting to the election date reflects a guilty conscience and a conscious effort to avoid past mistakes. Until the KMT understands why it has lost credibility with voters and the party takes positive steps to earn voters' trust, control of the government will remain out of its reach.
Kenneth Choy
Hong Kong
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS