When Taiwan's representative office in Britain issued a new passport and documents authorizing real estate transfers to Yeh Hsiu-chen (葉秀貞), the wife of Andrew Wang (汪傳浦), who is wanted for his involvement in the Lafayette scandal, it caused a political storm.
The entire country is now wondering how such a mistake could occur, not once, but twice.
Pan-blue legislators have raised tough questions that suggested the scandal was not just a mistake, and the Taiwan Solidarity Union's (TSU) legislative caucus has reported the issue to the Control Yuan, asking it to investigate the officials handling the matter: Tien Hung-mao (田弘茂), Taiwan's representative to Britain, and former foreign minister Eugene Chien (簡又新). TSU Legislator Chen Chien-ming (陳建銘) has pointed out that liability for administrative negligence among foreign affairs staff should also be investigated, as well as whether collusion between officials and business leaders was involved. Chen also demanded that the government review the role of civil servants and whether illegal practices still exist.
At this time, there is no concrete proof of collusion between Wang and people inside or outside the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. However, given the political integrity of those involved, the ramifications could be damaging.
For example, before becoming foreign minister, Chien had to resign from his post as transportation and communications minister in connection with corruption surrounding highway construction projects. However, coming from a respected Taoyuan family adept at manipulating private relationships with high-level leaders, Chien was still trusted and given important posts by two consecutive presidents, even after his resignation. He advanced quickly in rank, from Taiwan's representative to Britain to advisor to the National Security Council; then from Presidential Office deputy secretary-general to the foreign ministry. This was met with much surprise, but the strong reaction did not affect him thanks to his presidential ties.
During Chien's term as foreign minister, he fulfilled his duties faithfully and energetically. His development of diplomatic relationships and state visits is praiseworthy, and he succeeded in reforming the old bureaucracy of the ministry. However, when weighing his successes against his failures, the government and the public may disagree on whether his legacy is positive or negative. It is most certainly a great failure.
If the upcoming investigation reveals a conspiracy in aiding suspected criminals, we cannot help but wonder why the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government continues to recruit officials with a history of corruption who worked in the old Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government. Is our government completely lacking talent? Or is it because these corrupt officials are needed to raise political donations?
President Chen Shui-bian (
It is time to reform and clean up the culture of corruption left over from the old KMT government. The DPP government should take this opportunity to get rid of politically appointed officials with a poor track record of integrity, lest they continue to embarrass the Chen administration.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS