Two years ago, if you had asked Lila Lipscomb what she stood for, she would have referred you to the flag in her garden and her four grown-up children. Her priorities were, in descending order of importance, family, faith, country and a place where all three met that she might have called "service": two of her children were in the military and she worked in the public sector, at an employment agency designed to get people off welfare.
She is, as she puts it, "an extremely strong woman. And I've raised my daughters to understand that they come from a long line of strong, independent women. So the men in our lives have to be very unique. Hence Pops."
Pops is her husband, Howard, an autoworker. He accompanied Lipscomb to London recently by way of moral support and sits across from her in the hotel suite, eyes brimming. What she is saying is not easy for either of them.
YUSHA
Lipscomb describes an event that changed their lives and forced a seismic shift in their political perceptions; a shift that she hopes millions of her fellow Americans will be making between now and election time in November.
To her surprise, and the surprise of all who know her, Lipscomb is becoming a figurehead in the fight to oust US President George W. Bush.
It has been a few weeks now since Fahrenheit 9/11, Michael Moore's polemic on Bush and the war in Iraq, was released in the US, and in that time Lipscomb's voice has emerged as the film's most powerful.
As with any project generated by Moore, the film will be loved and loathed in equal measure, but whatever one thinks of him, it is hard to resist the testimony of Lipscomb, 50, from Flint, Michi-gan, who still flies a flag in her garden, but is down to three children and a handful of ruptured assumptions where certainties used to be.
The scenes in which she recounts the story of her son Michael's death have had cinema-goers sniffling into their sleeves. "For many years," Lipscomb says , "I thought I had to control everything. I had a real controlling spirit. But, boy, when the army stands in your house and tells you that your oldest son is killed, all that flies out the window. Over this last year and a half, I've been known to cry a bit."
The power of Lipscomb's story lies in the sharpness of the U-turn she made and her eloquence in speaking about it. Initially, she supported the war, on the assumption that the government knew best.
But just two weeks into the conflict her 26-year-old son, an army sergeant, was shot down while serving as a door gunner in a Black Hawk helicopter.
Five other soldiers died with him.
A week or so later she received his last letter, in which he told her he thought Bush had lost the plot and that they shouldn't be in Iraq, that the whole thing was folly.
Moore got wind of it when Lipscomb and her family were featured in Newsweek, and he flew to his hometown for a meeting.
"Michael Moore said he'd already been around America interviewing all different types of people. It was the most incredible experience; he was sitting in our living room and all of a sudden, during the talking and sharing, a tear fell from his eye. His producer said afterward, `Michael found it, he found it, he found what the movie was going to be about!'" she said.
Lipscomb should by rights have been suspicious of Moore. She is a Democrat, but a conservative one. She is, or at least was, conformist enough so that even now if the draft was enforced she says she wouldn't urge desertion, because that would be breaking the law.
"I instilled in my children, as it was instilled in me that, regardless of who is elected the president of the United States of America, it is the position that you honor. It doesn't matter if they are Republican or Democrat. Boy, what an awakening."
She had seen Moore's first film, Roger and Me, a documentary about the closure of Flint's General Motors plant, and was impressed. When he asked her to participate in Fahrenheit 9/11 she watched his last film, Bowling for Columbine. This also, she thought, had merit.
But she had other reasons for taking part: chiefly guilt, for not having spoken up sooner, for having been complacent and gullible enough to believe Bush's arguments for war.
"The reason I didn't hesitate was because I was carrying my son's words with me. And as a mother I have to carry each and every day the fact, could I have done a little bit more?
"Could I have been more vocal so that the president would not have been given that much authority within himself? And nobody can make that go away.
"My son got sent into harm's way by a decision made by the president of the United States that was based on a lie. Would my son still be here today if I had had my uprising then?" she wondered.
The day Michael decided to join the army, she says, "I was so proud of him, so proud of him. It was the first grown-up, manly decision that he'd ever made in his life."
She knew the risks -- her daughter Jennifer served in the first Gulf war -- but she also thought it a smart career move for people in their position, a low-income family. Then, over Christmas 2002, on his last home visit, Michael said something surprising.
"I so vividly remember. I walked out of my bedroom and we have a long hallway upstairs and he was standing there and he said he would have to go to Kuwait and then to Baghdad. And he said he didn't support the war, that he didn't know why he had to go over there. We talked about fear. I was petrified, because in my mind I was thinking that's where bin Laden is, because that's what we'd been told," she said.
She knows better now, she says, about the failure to find a connection between bin Laden and Iraq, about the failure to prove the existence of weapons of mass destruction. Moore's film follows her to the White House, where she tries to have it out with someone, but is refused entry.
Instead, she is berated by a passer-by who accuses her, as an antiwar campaigner, of "staging" many of the tragedies involved in the conflict.
"My son is dead," she said. "That is not staged." And her legs buckle under her.
In its first three days, Fahrenheit 9/11 grossed US$21.8 million -- Harry Potter took US$11.4 million over the same period -- across 868 cinemas in the US; that number will rise this week.
Lipscomb is rapidly becoming a celebrity.
She was spotted twice at airports on the way to Britain.
"Isn't that awesome? And I'm just a mother from Flint," she said.
The downside is that she will probably experience more hostility from people who find her stance unpatriotic.
"Yes, oh yes. There's a few I'm sure who hate me. But that's OK. Because that's what America is all about; you are free to hate who you want to hate and like who you want to like," she said.
But so far, she has had only positive responses. The letters and e-mails are pouring in, many from the parents of soldiers serving in Iraq who have echoed the sentiments of her son. She is a member of Military Families Speak Out, a US organization for people "with relatives or loved ones in the military" who oppose the war in Iraq. "Through us, their voices will be heard."
She has heard from people all over the country, "just incredible, incredible, men calling and leaving messages, sobbing and thanking me for my courage. Women just going `Yeah! Michael has a hell of a mother.' And then the night of the Flint showing (of Fahrenheit 9/11), there was a message from a young lady named Tracy." Tracy had been friends with Michael when they were children and hadn't known he was dead until she saw the film; she had to be carried out. Tracy is in the Navy and on her way to Iraq.
The most surprising letter came from a man Lipscomb knew only slightly, who had sold her her house.
"It was a full-page, handwritten letter from a man -- that in itself is unique. He said he'd seen the film and when he got home he had to write. He had always been a very strong Republican, but his views are now changed," she said.
Lipscomb's employers have been supportive. Her friends in Flint have been stunned. She wonders if her phone has been bugged and how her unlisted number seems to have become quickly and widely known.
"Interesting, isn't it?" she said.
And she wonders if she will ever get to the White House. It is on her to-do list.
"When I go to Washington DC as an American citizen I have a right, I have a right to go to the White House and I'll not stop until that right is given back to us. My son's blood paid for that White House, and I can't go in? That's my White House. I'm furious," she said.
What would she say to Bush if she met him? "God have mercy." She shakes her head. "God have mercy."
Now, instead of telling them to trust authority, Lipscomb is raising her seven grandchildren to question it.
"I tell them: If you don't understand something, ask. And if you still don't understand it, go to the next level. And the next. And the next," she said.
With this in mind, she intends to hold off deciding who to vote for (she knows who she isn't voting for) until she has sussed out Senator John Edwards, the running mate announced by the presumptive Democrat candidate, Senator John Kerry.
"I really don't know anything about this man," she said.
"I'm not going to listen to what the TV says; I'm not going to listen to what the radio says. I have to find a way for him to answer my questions, either by sitting down with him, or by being at one of his rallies.
"That's how serious this is to me. I'm not playing," she said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS