Hong Kong's Wen Wei Po newspaper has reported that former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (
This has caused an uproar among politicians and the media in Taiwan. For those who, deep in their hearts, support China against Taiwan, this is the sort of news to make them excited. Since there is virtually no popular support for their ideology, they rely on such statements to lift their morale.
Ever since the publication of T-Day, August 1995, such people have sensationalized news of a possible invasion like drug addicts, making the most of it as a "fix" to keep them going.
Prior to this most recent incident, the discussion had been whether China would invade in 2006. This news also emanated from Beijing.
Rumor had it that the reason for selecting this date to attack Taiwan was that China would still have two years to put matters right [with the international community], so as not to affect the 2008 Beijing Olympics.
Early last month Vice Minis-ter of National Defense Michael Tsai (蔡明憲), when being questioned on the possible invasion threat in 2006 by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and People First Party (PFP) legislators, said: An assessment by the US Department of Defense indicates that by 2006 or 2008, China would pose a credible military threat.
Taiwan understands that such thinking exists, but neither accepts it nor rejects it. This statement was later turned into Tsai's own statement about the military situation.
If we compare this statement with the news about an attack around the year 2020 revealed by Wen Wei Po, the situation seems to be hopelessly confused. Does China intend to attack Taiwan in 2006, or in 2020? Such contradictory statements emanating from China can only indicate that they are in a quandary about what to do about Taiwan's growing awareness of national sovereignty. The reason for their indecision is that they know that they cannot deceive, nor can they frighten, the US into rejecting its commitment to support Taiwan.
The exposure given to news about China's military has reached such a level as to be no longer rational. Every military exercise, every military appointment, is now regarded as related to an invasion of Taiwan. Does this level of excitement indicate that such people love Taiwan, or that they love the idea that China will invade Taiwan?
Will China invade? To answer with an absolute negative is to be unrealistic, for China's leaders might have a moment of madness, and for this reason, this country should prepare itself for war. Apart from the annual Han Kuang military exercises, the public also has to be psychologically prepared, otherwise, if it comes to the worst, response will be uncoordinated and surrender will be the only option.
But there is not much probability that China will invade. China's leaders are now all big bosses, collecting the profits of capitalism.
If war breaks out, foreign investment will be withdrawn, and they will lose their opportunities for profit and corruption.
According to the Nanfang Daily, an official publication of the Guangdong Provincial Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, figures released by the State Development Planning Council show that foreign direct investment in China exceeded US$500 billion at the end of last year. This accounted for over 40 percent of GDP, a level significantly higher than in developed countries or other countries in Asia. This already presents significant potential problems that cannot be ignored, let alone if there was a war.
The Chinese military wants a war, but the politicians don't. The central government wants a war, but the provinces don't. The generals want a war, but the soldiers don't. In the face of such internal contradictions, it will be difficult to launch an invasion.
There is also the cumulative popular anger over the gulf between the rich and the poor, heavy taxes and the scandals caused by loopholes in the financial system, which could also topple the government. This is a price the Chinese Communist Party is not willing to pay. And this does not take into account Taiwan's ability to counterattack and possible international involvement.
But fundamentally, China won't invade because the US still supports Taiwan.
The media has sought to make the most of China's military exercises off Dongshan Island, but we must also remember that the US is also conducting military exercises not far away.
If China's military exercise spills over into actual warfare, the US will have troops immediately on hand.
This is the most practical support that the US can give to Taiwan. Those people who devote themselves to undermining our relationship with the US may simply not love Taiwan. They should be criticized for helping Beijing undermine the Taiwan-US relationship and trying to give it an opportunity to invade.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS