Impervious to pressure from Beijing, Singaporean
Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) is
visiting Taiwan this week in a private capacity prior to officially taking up his appointment as prime minister next month.
Despite the low profile of the visit and the secrecy surrounding his schedule, the media nonetheless caught the pomp and ceremony extended by President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and members of his government to the young national leader. The visit not only benefits Lee's personal reputation, but also substantially promotes the relationship between Singapore and Taiwan. This visit is a masterly diplomatic move.
Building a positive communication channel between the leaders of Taiwan and Singapore is obviously what is expected by the international community and the people of the two countries. Lee Kuan Yew (李光耀), the father of Lee Hsien Loong, during his term as prime minister and since his retirement has maintained an active commitment to cross-strait and East Asian affairs. Moreover, Lee Kuan Yew's hard work for Singapore's prosperity has earned him recognition and respect in the international community.
But in the 1990s, in the face of a growing Chinese economy and the active democratic reforms in Taiwan, the older Lee proposed strengthening regional cooperation in order to develop the Chinese market. To this end, he made several speeches unfavorable to the rise of an awareness of national sovereignty in Taiwan. This had the obvious effect of changing the relationship between the leaders of Singapore and Taiwan. The move also cost Lee the role of a special envoy between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Nevertheless, the older Lee retained his political insight. Shortly after Chen was elected Taipei mayor in 1994, Lee enthusiastically and repeatedly invited Chen to visit Singapore and built close private relations with him. Although former Taiwanese president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) often criticized his Singaporean counterpart for his differing political views, Chen rolled out the red carpet for Lee Kuan Yew after winning the 2000 election. Invited to Singapore by the Lee family, former Taipei County commissioner Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) secretly visited the city state in May before he assumed the post of the secretary-general at the Presidential Office.
Right after the younger Lee's visit to China last month, he came to Taiwan and met the leaders of both the government and opposition camps, as well as American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) director Douglas Paal. He was well received in every respect and successfully boosted his international image. The Singaporean government's diplomatic maneuver and its sophisticated efforts to maintain cross-strait relations are self-evident.
Taiwan-Singapore relations are founded largely on trade and discussions surrounding a free trade agreement between the two countries, cooperation on security issues and the degree of Singapore's involvement in regional affairs. All of this will take place in private, out of the ceremonial limelight.
As for any breakthrough on cross-strait relations, we hope that Lee Hsien Loong will seek to understand Taiwan with even greater sincerity and convey what he has learned about Taiwan to the authorities in Beijing.
As a reasonable man and spokesman for Taiwan, he will be able to help reduce the possibility of a misunderstanding between the two sides. But our expectations for this soon-to-be prime minister should not be raised too high. Even though Singapore has played a role in cross-strait relations, the resumption of cross-strait dialogue will depend entirely on Beijing's attitude.
If Beijing continues to reject political change in Taiwan and continues to put its faith in extremist unificationist political groups, then it doesn't matter how magnificent the stage is on which these international events take place.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS