On Friday, the Ministry of National Defense (MND) briefed an invited group of media representatives on its arms purchase proposals. This was obviously a MND attempt to seek popular support for the purchases against the backdrop of a continued deadlock between the Legislative Yuan and the Executive Yuan over the special arms purchase budget.
The MND is obviously in a hurry to have the deal sealed. As conceded by the Defense Minister Lee Jye (
Threats posed by China are another reason for the big hurry. Not only have China's annual military budgets grown by multiples, but the real figures are believed to be much higher -- estimates have put them at two to three times higher -- than the officially announced budgets.
While the concerns that the Legislative Yuan, or really the pan-blue opposition, have about the arms purchases are not entirely groundless, they pale in comparison with the nation's security needs.
One concern cited has been the likelihood of corruption and kickback commissions. Of course this skepticism comes from the nation's experience in connection with the purchase of Lafayette submarines from France in the 1990s.
However, this does not mean that Taiwan should stop purchasing arms altogether just to avoid a repeat of that kind of corruption. Instead, open and transparent information on pricing and negotiations can help reduce the likelihood of corruption.
As for the pan-blue lawmakers' request that the submarines proposed for purchase be manufactured here, the MND suggests there are feasibility issues. According to Li, lacking design, quality control and testing capabilities, after the state-owned China Shipbuilding (中船) completes construction of the submarines, it will face the same situation as Aerospace Industrial Development Corp (漢翔) did. After this company finished building fighter jets for the government, its manufacturing lines were shut down because no further orders were forthcoming. Moreover, many foreign governments have been unwilling to issue export permits required for some highly sensitive and sophisticated parts and components. Unless this problem is solved, China Shipbuilding's ability to build the submarines in question remains problematic.
Finally, there is the difficult issue of price. The pan-blue camp had asked that the total price of the arms purchase -- NT$610 billion -- be reduced by NT$200 billion in the event that China Shipbuilding cannot assemble the submarines. On the other hand, the pan-green camp is saying that the deal would be acceptable so long as the price is cut by NT$100 billion.
While efforts to cut prices should be appreciated, two things must be kept in mind -- they must be done for the right reasons (not merely to vex the government) and they must conform to the realistic situation of the market.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS